A three-strain synthetic community model whose rapid response to antagonism allows the study of higher-order dynamics and emergent properties in minutes
Aguilar-Salinas, B.; Olmedo-Alvarez, G.
Show abstract
A fundamental question in the assembly of microbial communities is how complex systems arise from a few components. Synthetic communities allow addressing the dynamics and mechanisms of complex microbial interactions. Most studies on microbial interactions are done in lapses of hours and even days, but microbes must be able to sense danger in seconds. We assembled a three-strain synthetic community from the phylum Bacillota that, based on previously evaluated paired interactions, appear to have different ecological roles: resistant (R), antagonists (A), and sensitive (S). The BARS synthetic community (Bacillota A + S + R) reproduces features of complex communities and exhibits higher-order interaction dynamics. The majority of the S strain population, Sutclifiella horikoshii 20a, dies within 5 min in a paired interaction with A strain, Bacillus pumilus 145. An emergent property appears upon adding the third interactor, as antagonism of strain A over S is not observed in the presence of the R strain, Bacillus cereus 111. After the first five min a change of state of the cells is observed, as the surviving population of the S strain seemed to have acquired tolerance to A. In summary, our model allows the study of the assembly dynamics of a three-species community and to evaluate the immediate outcome within a 30 min frame. The BARS has features of a complex system where the paired interactions do not predict the community dynamics. The model is amenable to mechanistic dissection and to modeling how the parts integrate to achieve collective properties. 1 IMPORTANCEMicrobial communities are of utmost importance, given their roles in health, agriculture, and all biogeochemical cycles on Earth. Synthetic ecology studies communities by reducing the number of variables. Microbial interactions are usually evaluated in hours or days, however, upon a first encounter, bacteria must respond in minutes, particularly when competition involves killing of neighboring cells. We generated a synthetic community of three species that allows the study of community dynamics in a 30 min frame. We denominated our model BARS as it comprises Bacillota strains that in paired interactions are Antagonist, Resistant, or Sensitive. Even though in paired interaction the antagonist kills the sensitive strain, in a triple interaction, the resistant strain provides stability to the community by neutralizing the antagonism. Therefore, BARS is a rapid response model with features of a complex system where the paired interactions do not predict the community dynamics and exhibit emergent properties.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- When does a Lotka-Volterra model represent microbial interactions? Insights from in-vitro nasal bacterial communities 96%
- Kinetics-based Inference of Environment-Dependent Microbial Interactions and Their Dynamic Variation 94%
- A model Roseobacter employs a diffusible killing mechanism to eliminate competitors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scaling down the microbial loop: data-driven modelling of growth interactions in a diatom-bacterium co-culture 96%
- Sessile bacterium unlocks ability of surface motility through mutualistic interspecies interaction 94%
- Gliding motility of a uranium tolerant Bacteroidetes bacterium Chryseobacterium sp. strain PMSZPI: Insights into the architecture of spreading colonies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacteria-phage (co)evolution is constrained in a synthetic community across multiple bacteria-phage pairs 94%
- Testing for the fitness benefits of natural transformation during community-embedded evolution 93%
- Evolution and coexistence in response to a key innovation in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.