Back

The aerobiology of SARS-CoV-2 in UK hospitals and the impact of aerosol generating procedures

Gould, S.; Byrne, R. L.; Edwards, T.; Aljayyoussi, G.; Wooding, D.; Buist, K.; Kontogianni, K.; Bennett, A. M.; Atkinson, B.; Moore, G.; Dunning, J.; Todd, S.; Hoyle, M.-C.; Turtle, L.; Solomon, T.; Fitzgerald, R.; Beadsworth, M.; Garner, P.; Adams, E. R.; Fletcher, T.

2022-09-09 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.09.07.22279662 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 nosocomial transmission to patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) has occurred throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) seemed particularly risky, and policies have restricted their use in all settings. We examined the prevalence of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 in the rooms of COVID-19 patients requiring AGP or supplemental oxygen compared to those on room air. MethodsSamples were collected prospectively near to adults hospitalised with COVID-19 at two tertiary care hospitals in the UK from November 2020 - October 2021. The Sartorius MD8 AirPort air sampler was used to collect air samples at a minimum distance of 1.5 meters from patients. RT-qPCR was used following overnight incubation of membranes in culture media and extraction. ResultsWe collected 219 samples from patients rooms: individuals on room air (n=67), receiving oxygen (n=65) or AGP (n=67). Of these, 54 (24.6%) samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA. The highest prevalence was identified in the air around patients receiving oxygen (32.3%, n=21, CI95% 22.2 to 44.3%) with AGP and room air recording prevalence of (20.7%, n=18, CI95% 14.1 - 33.7%) and (22.3%, n=15, CI95% 13.5 - 30.4%) respectively. We did not detect a significant difference in the observed frequency of viral RNA between interventions. InterpretationSARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected in the air of hospital rooms of COVID-19 patients, and AGPs did not appear to impact the likelihood of viral RNA. Enhanced respiratory protection and appropriate infection prevention and control measures are required to be fully and carefully implemented for all COVID-19 patients to reduce risk of aerosol transmission.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%