Real-world Effectiveness of Sotrovimab for the Early Treatment of COVID-19 During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Waves in the United States
Cheng, M. M.; Reyes, C.; Satram, S.; Birch, H.; Gibbons, D. C.; Drysdale, M.; Bell, C. F.; Suyundikov, A.; Ding, X.; Maher, M. C.; Yeh, W.; Telenti, A.; Corey, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundSotrovimab, a recombinant human monoclonal antibody (mAb) against SARS-CoV-2 had US FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the treatment of high-risk outpatients with mild- to-moderate COVID-19 from May 26, 2021 to April 5, 2022. The study objective was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab in reducing the risk of 30-day all-cause hospitalization and/or mortality during the time period when the prevalence of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants was changing between Delta and Omicron sub-lineages in the US. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on de-identified claims data for 1,530,501 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (ICD-10: U07.1) from September 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022, in the FAIR Health National Private Insurance Claims (FH NPIC(R)) database. Patients meeting EUA high-risk criteria were identified via pre-specified ICD-10-CM diagnoses in records [≤]24 months prior to their first COVID-19 diagnosis and divided into two cohorts based on claimed procedural codes: treated with sotrovimab ("sotrovimab") and not treated with a mAb ("no mAb"). All-cause hospitalizations and facility-reported all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis ("30-day hospitalization or mortality") were identified. Multivariable and propensity score-matched Poisson and logistic regressions were conducted to estimate the adjusted relative risk (RR) and odds of 30-day hospitalization or mortality among those treated with sotrovimab compared with those not treated with a mAb. ResultsOf the high-risk COVID-19 patients identified, 15,633 were treated with sotrovimab and 1,514,868 were not treated with a mAb. Compared with the no mAb cohort, the sotrovimab cohort was older and had a higher proportion of patients across the majority of high-risk conditions. In the no mAb cohort, 84,307 (5.57%) patients were hospitalized and 8,167 (0.54%) deaths were identified, while in the sotrovimab cohort, 418 (2.67%) patients were hospitalized and 13 (0.08%) deaths were identified. After adjusting for potential confounders, high-risk COVID-19 patients treated with sotrovimab had a 55% relative risk reduction of 30-day hospitalization or mortality (RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.41,0.49) and an 85% relative risk reduction of 30-day mortality (RR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.29) compared with high-risk patients not treated with a mAb. From September 2021 to April 2022, sotrovimab maintained clinical effectiveness with relative risk reductions of 30-day hospitalization or mortality ranging from 46% to 71%. Stratifying by high-risk condition, sotrovimab-treated patients exhibited statistically significant relative risk reductions of 30-day hospitalization or mortality compared with the no mAb cohort across all high-risk conditions (P<0.0001), ranging from 44% among pregnant women to 70% among patients 65 years and older. ConclusionIn this large, US real-world, observational study of high-risk COVID-19 patients with reported diagnosis between September 2021 and April 2022 during the Delta and early Omicron variant waves, treatment with sotrovimab was associated with reduced risk of 30-day all-cause hospitalization and facility-reported mortality compared with no mAb treatment. Sotrovimab clinical effectiveness persisted throughout the months when Delta and early Omicron sub-lineages were the predominant circulating variants in the US, though there was an uncertain RR estimate in April 2022 with wide confidence intervals due to the small sample size. Sotrovimab clinical effectiveness also persisted among all high-risk subgroups assessed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of healthcare resource use and cost between influenza and COVID-19 vaccine coadministration and influenza vaccination only 94%
- Clinical Benefits and Budget Impact of Lenzilumab plus Standard of Care Compared with Standard of Care Alone for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in the United States from the Hospital Perspective 92%
- Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of the Next-Generation COVID-19 mRNA-1283 Vaccine in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intramuscular Versus Intravenous SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab for Treatment of COVID-19 (COMET-TAIL): A Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial 96%
- Effectiveness of the 2023-2024 Omicron XBB.1.5-containing mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273.815) in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and medical encounters among adults in the United States: An interim analysis 95%
- Risk of Post-COVID Conditions among adolescents and adults who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for acute COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-existing autoimmunity is associated with increased severity of COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study using data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 96%
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 94%
- Safety and Efficacy of Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: Interim Results From the CANOPY Clinical Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 93%
- Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 in people with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, or schwannomatosis 92%
- Evaluating the impact of modeling choices on the performance of integrated genetic and clinical models 90%
- Prospective evaluation of genome sequencing versus standard-of-care as a first molecular diagnostic test 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.