High-Frequency Stimulation Does Not Improve Comfort of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Dalrymple, A. N.; Hooper, C. A.; Kuriakose, M. G.; Capogrosso, M.; Weber, D. J.
Show abstract
Spinal cord neuromodulation has gained much attention for demonstrating improved motor recovery in people with spinal cord injury, motivating the development of clinically applicable technologies. Among them, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is attractive because of its non-invasive profile. Many tSCS studies employ a high-frequency (10 kHz) carrier, which has been reported to reduce stimulation discomfort. However, these claims have come under scrutiny in recent years. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-frequency tSCS is more comfortable at therapeutic amplitudes, which evoke posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes. In 16 neurologically intact participants, tSCS was delivered using a 1-ms long monophasic pulse with and without a high-frequency carrier. Stimulation amplitude and pulse duration were varied and PRM reflexes were recorded from the soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles. Participants rated their discomfort during stimulation from 0-10 at PRM reflex threshold. At PRM reflex threshold, high-frequency stimulation (0.87 {+/-} 0.2) was equally comfortable as conventional stimulation (1.03 {+/-} 0.18) but required approximately double the charge to evoke the PRM reflex (conventional: 32.4 {+/-} 9.2 {micro}C; high-frequency: 62.5 {+/-} 11.1 {micro}C). Strength-duration curves for high-frequency stimulation had a rheobase that was 4.8X greater and a chronaxie that was 5.7X narrower than the conventional monophasic pulse, indicating that high-frequency stimulation was less efficient in recruiting neural activity in spinal roots. High-frequency tSCS is equally as comfortable as conventional stimulation at amplitudes required to stimulate spinal dorsal roots. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=178 SRC="FIGDIR/small/506783v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f013f3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aded5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bad2e0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6aaf96_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of stimulus pulse rate on somatosensory adaptation in the human cortex 96%
- Tonic and phasic transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation both evoke rapid and transient pupil dilation 95%
- Timing is everything: event-related transcranial direct current stimulation improves motor adaptation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual responses to microstimulation frequency are spatially organized in human somatosensory cortex 95%
- I-Spin live: An open-source software based on blind-source separation for real-time decoding of motor unit activity in humans 94%
- Tuning of motor outputs produced by spinal stimulation during voluntary control of torque directions in monkeys 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 92%
- Stimulation-related increases in power spectral density covary with clinical evidence of overstimulation during deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia 91%
- Intraoperative laryngeal muscle and heart rate responses to implanted vagus nerve stimulation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.