Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis notification in Brazil
Pelissari, D. M.; Batholomay, P.; Johansen, F. D. C.; Diaz-Quijano, F. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic notably impacted tuberculosis notification and detection in Brazil. We estimated the number of unnotified tuberculosis cases by group population over the first two years (2020-2021) of the pandemic. MethodsWe extracted tuberculosis case notifications from routine national surveillance records and population from Ministry of Health. We estimated trends for case notification during pre-pandemic period (2015-2019), stratified by sex, age group, and State with a mixed-effects model. We calculated the unnotified cases during 2020-2021 as the difference between expected, and reported values. ResultsWe estimated 11647 (95% uncertain interval [95%UI]: 829,22466) unnotified cases for 2020; and, 6170 (95%UI: -4629,16968) for 2021; amounting 17817 unnotified cases over the two years. Of the estimated expected tuberculosis cases in 2020 and 2021, 11.2% were not notified. Across sex and age, men aged 30-59 years had the highest number of unnotified cases, and men aged 0-14 years had the highest proportion of unnotified cases. Case underreporting was significant for 13 (of the 27 States) in 2020, and for four in 2021. ConclusionsTuberculosis cases notification decreased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Our analysis helped identify the most affected populations to plan strategies to mitigate the effects of the pandemic on tuberculosis control. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSA systematic review was conducted to retrieve studies that aimed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis detection in PubMed with the following terms: "(TB or tuberculosis) and (incidence or case or notification or burden) and (COVID-19 or pandemic)" from January 2020 to May 2022, returning 189 records. Out of these studies, we analyzed 17 that reported a decrease in tuberculosis notification during the pandemic years, and most of them with data only from the first year of the pandemic. Two studies were carried out with Brazilian data. One of them focused on the number of tuberculosis consultations at the benning of the pandemic, and the other was a government bulletin describing tuberculosis notification. As far as we know, no study has examined the tuberculosis case notification in Brazil during the two years of the pandemic, by group population. Furthermore, none of them had predicted the expected cases considering local trends in both the incidence of tuberculosis and its main determinants. Added value of this studyUsing tuberculosis case reports from routine national surveillance registries, we estimated case notification trends during the pre-pandemic period (2015-2019), stratified by sex, age group, and State and calculated the unnotified cases during 2020-2021. Brazil lost 11647 (95% uncertain interval [95%UI]: 829,22466) tuberculosis cases in 2020; and, 6170 (95%UI: - 4629,16968) in 2021, which represents 11.2% of underreporting in both years. Across sex and age, men aged 30 to 59 years had the highest number of unnotified cases, and men aged 0 to 14 years had the highest proportion of unnotified cases. Case underreporting was significant for 13 (of the 27 States) in 2020, and for four in 2021. Implications of all the available evidenceThe COVID-19 pandemic had a catastrophic effect in tuberculosis notification in Brazil during 2020 and 2021. This resulted in a setback in progress made over decades in tuberculosis control, and highlight the threat posed by tuberculosis transmission. Several lessons learned from response to COVID-19 provide an opportunity to improve the notification of respiratory diseases.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes at a national referral hospital in Sierra Leone, 2017 to 2022: a retrospective study 96%
- Higher loss of livelihood and impoverishment in households affected by tuberculosis compared to non-tuberculosis affected households in Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study 94%
- Evaluating the health impact, health-system costs and cost-effectiveness of using TrueNat on stool samples compared to usual care for the diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis in primary care settings: a modelling analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic differences in TB treatment outcomes across in Brazil by patient- and area-related factors: an analysis of national disease registry data 96%
- Determinants of losses in the latent tuberculosis infection cascade of care in Brazil: a prospective multicenter cohort study 95%
- Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional standardized patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time Trend, Social Vulnerability, and Identification of Risk Areas for Tuberculosis in Brazil: an Ecological Study 96%
- Predictive factors for unfavourable treatment in MDR-TB and XDR-TB patients in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, 2000-2016 95%
- Social, demographic, health care and co-morbidity predictors of tuberculosis mortality in Amazonas, Brazil: a multiple cause of death approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing ethambutol and integrating drugs into fixed-dose tablets on mortality in patients with tuberculosis 94%
- Identifying hidden Zika hotspots in Pernambuco, Brazil: A spatial analysis 91%
- Disruptions to schistosomiasis programmes due to COVID-19: an analysis of potential impact and mitigation strategies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global estimates of tuberculosis incidence during pregnancy and postpartum: a rapid review and modelling analysis 93%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Iquitos, Loreto, Peru 92%
- The natural history of TB disease-a synthesis of data to quantify progression and regression across the spectrum 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.