Advanced Care Planning (ACP) in the early phase of COVID-19: A rapid review of the practice and policy lessons learned.
Younan, S.; Cardona, M.; Sahay, A.; Willis, E.; Ni Chroinin, D.
Show abstract
This rapid review of quantitative and qualitative publications of any design indexed in PUBMED between January 2020-April 2021 investigates barriers and enablers of advancecare planning (ACP) worldwide in the early stages of the life-threatening COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy-four papers were included: 35 primary research studies (cohorts, reviews, case studies, and cross-sectional designs) and 39 commentaries. Publications from hospitals, outpatient services, aged care and community indicated widespread interest in accelerating ACP documentation to facilitate management decisions and goal-aligned care. Enablers of ACP included targeted public awareness, availability of telehealth, access to online tools and a person-centered approaches. Barriers included uncertainty regarding clinical outcomes, cultural or communication difficulties, legal and ethical considerations, infection control restrictions, lack of time, and limited resources and support systems. The opportunities for rapid implementation of ACP offered by the social distancing restrictions and high demand for health services are valuable in informing future policy and practice. What this paper addsO_LIOur study adds to existing evidence by identifying emerging barriers and creative ways of overcoming them in response to a global crisis C_LIO_LIDiscussions on death prospects and care of the dying were feasible and a step towards normalisation of advance care planning C_LIO_LIDespite new and overwhelming challenges, policies and practices could be rapidly implemented to satisfy clinicians and families in need of advance care planning C_LI Applications of study findingsO_LIThe lessons learnt can be incorporated in future health service planning since the threat of other pandemics is real C_LIO_LIA formal evaluation of effectiveness of some of the emerging strategies would be a valuable addition to the evidence C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 93%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 93%
- Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 91%
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 90%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 93%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 93%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 92%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 94%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 93%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.