Novel subgroups of type 2 diabetes based on multi-Omics profiling: an IMI-RHAPSODY Study
Li, S.; Dragan, I.; Fung, C.; Kuznetsov, D.; Hansen, M.; Beulens, J.; 't Hart, L.; Slieker, R.; Donnelly, L.; Gerl, M.; Klose, C.; Mehl, f.; Simons, K.; Elders, P.; Pearson, E.; Rutter, G.; Ibberson, M.
Show abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a complex, multifactorial disease with varying presentation and underlying pathophysiology. Recent studies using data-driven cluster analysis have led to a stratification of type 2 diabetes into novel subgroups based on six clinical measurements. Whether these subgroups truly correspond to the underlying phenotypic differences is nevertheless unclear. Here, we apply an unsupervised, data-driven clustering method (Similarity Network Fusion) to characterize type 2 diabetes in two independent cohorts involving 1,134 subjects in total based on integrated plasma lipidomics and peptidomics data without pre-selection. Logistic regression was then used to explore clustering based on [≥] 180 circulating lipids and 1,195 protein biomarkers, alongside clinical signatures. Two subgroups were identified, one of which associated with elevated C-peptide levels, diabetic complications and more severe insulin resistance compared to the other. GWAS analysis against 403 type 2 diabetes risk variants revealed associations of several SNPs with clusters and altered molecular profiles. We thus demonstrate that heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes can be captured by circulating omics alone using an unsupervised bottom-up approach. Such multiomics signatures could reflect pathological mechanisms underlying type 2 diabetes and thus may help inform on precision medicine approaches to disease management.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Anna Karenina model of beta cell maturation in development and their dedifferentiation in type 1 and type 2 diabetes 95%
- Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis Using a Recessive Model Illuminates Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes 95%
- Plasma proteomic signatures of adiposity are associated with cardiovascular risk factors and type 2 diabetes risk in a multi-ethnic Asian population 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Young onset diabetes in Asian Indians is associated with lower measured and genetically determined beta-cell function: an INSPIRED study 95%
- Skeletal muscle and intermuscular adipose tissue gene expression profiling identifies new biomarkers with prognostic significance for insulin resistance progression and intervention response 94%
- Replication and cross-validation of T2D subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coordinated regulation of gene expression and microRNA changes in adipose tissue and circulating extracellular vesicles in response to pioglitazone treatment in humans with type 2 diabetes 94%
- The leptin receptor has no role in delta-cell control of beta-cell function in the mouse 92%
- Observational assessments of the relationship of dietary and pharmacological treatment on continuous measures of dysglycemia over 24 hours in women with gestational diabetes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflammatory cytokines rewire the proinsulin interaction network in human islets 94%
- Prevalence trends of diabetes subgroups in US: A data-driven analysis spanning three decades from NHANES (1988-2018) 94%
- Plasma lipidomic profiles and risk of diabetes: two prospective cohorts of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated miRNA_mRNA Analysis Reveals Dysregulated Regulatory Networks in Visceral Adipose Tissue Linked to Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes 93%
- Hepatic and abdominal adiposity in type 2 diabetes as assessed with machine learning on CT scans 91%
- Proteomic associations with fluctuation and long-term changes in BMI: A 40-year follow-up study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.