Back

Insomnia and risk of sepsis: A Mendelian randomization study

Thorkildsen, M. S.; Gustad, L. T.; Nilsen, T. I. L.; Damas, J. K.; Rogne, T.

2022-09-02 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.09.02.22279472 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceInsomnia has been associated with reduced immune function and increased risk of infections and sepsis in observational studies. These studies are prone to bias, such as residual confounding. To further understand the causal relation between insomnia and sepsis risk we used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. ObjectiveIs genetically predicted insomnia associated with risk of sepsis? DesignTwo-sample MR was performed to estimate the causal effect of genetically predicted insomnia on sepsis risk. Data was obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) identifying 556 independent genetic variants (R2<0.01) strongly associated with insomnia (P < 5e-8). We conducted sensitivity analyses to address bias due to pleiotropy and sample overlap, along with mediation analyses. SettingObservational study using genetic variants as instrumental variables in large populations. ParticipantsFor insomnia, 2.4 million subjects of European ancestry from the UK Biobank and 23andMe. For sepsis, 462,918 subjects of European ancestry from the UK Biobank. ExposureGenetically predicted insomnia. Main Outcome and MeasureSepsis. ResultsA doubling in the population prevalence of genetically predicted insomnia was associated with an odds ratio of 1.42 (95% CI 1.23-1.63, P = 9.1e-7) for sepsis. Sensitivity analyses supported this observation. Three quarters of the effect was mediated through body mass index. Conclusions and RelevanceThe concordance between our findings and previous observational studies support of a causal role of genetically predicted insomnia in the risk of sepsis.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
53.7%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
5
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%