Back

Structural insights into regulation of the PEAK3 scaffold by 14-3-3

Torosyan, H.; Paul, M. D.; Forget, A.; Lo, M.; Diwanji, D.; Pawlowski, K.; Krogan, N. J.; Jura, N.; Verba, K. A.

2022-09-02 biophysics
10.1101/2022.09.01.506268 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The three members of the PEAK family of pseudokinases (PEAK1, PEAK2, and PEAK3) are molecular scaffolds that have recently emerged as important regulatory nodes in signaling pathways that control cell migration, morphology, and proliferation, and they are increasingly found to be mis-regulated in human cancers. While no structures of PEAK3 have been solved to date, crystal structures of the PEAK1 and PEAK2 pseudokinase domains revealed their dimeric organization. It remains unclear how dimerization plays a role in PEAK scaffolding functions, as no structures of PEAK family members in complex with their binding partners have been solved. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of the PEAK3 pseudokinase, also adopting a dimeric state, and in complex with an endogenous 14-3-3 heterodimer purified from mammalian cells. Our structure reveals an asymmetric binding mode between PEAK3 and 14-3-3 stabilized by one pseudokinase domain and the Split HElical Dimerization (SHED) domain of the PEAK3 dimer. The binding interface is comprised of a canonical primary interaction involving two phosphorylated 14-3-3 consensus binding sites located in the N-terminal domains of the PEAK3 monomers docked in the conserved amphipathic grooves of the 14-3-3 dimer, and a unique secondary interaction between 14-3-3 and PEAK3 that has not been observed in any previous structures of 14-3-3/client complexes. Disruption of these interactions results in the relocation of PEAK3 to the nucleus and changes its cellular interactome. Lastly, we identify Protein Kinase D as the regulator of the PEAK3/14-3-3 interaction, providing a mechanism by which the diverse functions of the PEAK3 scaffold might be fine-tuned in cells.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.