Back

Treatment-mediated selection of lethal prostate cancer clones defined by copy number architectures

Hasan, A. M. M.; Cremaschi, P.; Wetterskog, D.; Jayaram, A.; Wong, S. Q.; Williams, S.; Pasam, A.; Trigos, A.; Trujillo, B.; Grist, E.; Friedrich, S.; Vainauskas, O.; Parry, M.; Ismail, M.; Devlies, W.; Wingate, A.; Lise, S.; Sandhu, S.; Attard, G.

2022-09-03 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.09.01.506183 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite initial responses to hormone treatment, metastatic prostate cancer invariably evolves to a lethal state. To characterize the intra-patient relationships of metastases that evade treatment, we performed genomewide copy number profiling and bespoke approaches targeting the androgen receptor (AR) on 142 metastatic regions from 10 organs harvested post-mortem from nine men who died from prostate cancer. We identified diverse and patient-unique alterations clustering around the AR in metastases from every patient with evidence of independent acquisition of related genomic changes within an individual and, in some patients, the co-existence of AR-neutral clones. Using the genomic boundaries of pan-autosome copy number change, we confirmed a common clone of origin across metastases and diagnostic biopsies; and identified in individual patients, clusters of metastases occupied by dominant clones with diverged autosomal copy number alterations. Autosome-defined clusters were characterized by cluster-specific AR gene architectures that in two index cases were topologically more congruent than by chance (p-values 0.03, 3.07x10-8). Integration with anatomical site suggested patterns of spread and points of genomic divergence. Copy number boundaries identified treatment-selected clones with putatively distinct lethal trajectories. Statement of significanceLethal prostate cancer evolves from a single clone of origin and upon a treatment-mediated selection, progresses to lethal disease via a limited number of related clones harboring patient-unique androgen receptor gene architectures.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.