Back

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings of COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Myocarditis at Intermediate Follow Up: a Comparison to Classic Myocarditis and MIS-C Related Myocarditis

Dove, M. L.; Slesnick, T. C.; Oster, M. E.; Hashemi, S.; Patel, T.; Wilson, H. C.

2022-09-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2022.09.01.22279517 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo report intermediate cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings of COVID-19 vaccine associated myocarditis (C-VAM) and compare to classic myocarditis (CM) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Study DesignRetrospective cohort study including children diagnosed with C-VAM from 5/2021 through 12/2021 with early and intermediate CMR. Patients with CM and MIS-C with intermediate CMR were included for comparison. ResultsThere were 8 patients with C-VAM, 20 with CM, and 61 with MIS-C. Among those with C-VAM, CMR performed at median 3 days (IQR 3, 7) revealed 2/8 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<55%, 7/7 patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and 5/8 patients with elevated native T1 values. Borderline T2 values suggestive of myocardial edema were present in 6/8. Follow-up CMRs performed at median 107 days (IQR 97, 177) showed normal ventricular systolic function, T1, and T2 values; 3/7 patients had LGE. At intermediate follow up the C-VAM group had a lower percentage of LVEF<55% compared to CM and MIS-C (0.0 vs 30.0 vs 6.6%, respectively, p=0.018) and an intermediate degree of LGE (42.9 vs 75.0 vs 3.3%, respectively, p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed fewer myocardial segments with LGE in the C-VAM group versus CM (4/119 vs 42/340, p=0.004) and more segments with LGE than MIS-C (4/119 vs 2/1020, p=0.0014). ConclusionPatients with C-VAM had no evidence of active inflammation or ventricular dysfunction on intermediate CMR although a minority had persistent LGE. Intermediate findings in C-VAM may be favorable compared to CM though LGE is more common compared to MIS-C.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.