Back

Automatic Sample Segmentation & Detection of Parkinson's Disease Using Synthetic Staining & Deep Learning

Pearce, B. M.; Coetzee, P. L.; Rowland, D.; Dexter, D. T.; Gveric, D. O.; Gentleman, S.

2022-09-01 pathology
10.1101/2022.08.30.505459 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The identification of Parkinsons Disease (PD) from post-mortem brain slices is time consuming for highly trained neuropathologists, often taking many hours per case. In this study, we demonstrate fully automatic PD detection, from single 1000um regions, from sections spanning from the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve to the frontal cortex. This is achieved via image processing and statistical methods, with improved accuracy demonstrated when using machine learning. Digitised stained brain sections were processed via a deep neural network to produce re-coloured, or synthetically stained, images which were then filtered and passed to a secondary network for classification. We demonstrate state-of-the-art PD detection (>90% accuracy on single 1000um regions), with the ability to perform binary classification on high resolution sections within minutes, in addition to demarcating regions of interest to the pathologist for manual visual verification. Executive SummaryThe identification of Parkinsons Disease (PD) from post-mortem brain slices is time consuming for highly trained neuropathologists, often taking many hours per case. Accurate classification and stratification of PD is critical for the confirmation that the brain donor suffered from PD and to maximise the potential usefulness of the brain in research studies to better understand the causes of PD and foster drug development. Parkinsons UK Brain Bank, at Imperial College London, has produced a dataset containing digitised images of brain sections immunostained for the protein alpha-synuclein (-syn), the pathological marker of PD; along with control cases from healthy donors. This dataset is much larger (over 400 cases), more consistent, and of higher quality (all have been stained with the same protocol and imaged within the same laboratory) than has been documented elsewhere in the literature; including those found in a meta-analysis study on detection of neurological disorders containing over 200 papers (Lima et al., 2022). The project team, consisting of neuroscientists and subject matter experts from: Imperial, NHS AI Lab Skunkworks, Parkinsons UK, and Polygeist have undertaken a 12 week project to examine the possibility of producing a Proof-of-Concept (PoC) tool to automatically load, enhance and ultimately classify those brain sections containing -syn. The initial focus of the project was to make a tool that could make a biomarker of PD, -syn, more visible to the pathologist; saving time in searching for the protein manually. This goal was quickly reached, producing a tool that could synthetically stain the -syn, marking regions of interest in a high-contrast bright green, making them quickly identifiable for the pathologist. Statistical analysis of the synthetically stained images showed that very few regions in the control group were stained compared to the PD group, raising the possibility that an automatic classifier could be developed, which became a stretch goal for the project. A bespoke neural network model was designed that processed the synthetically stained segments of each immunostained section and produced a binary judgement (whether a segment contains PD pathology or not). The model achieved >90% sensitivity for PD detection, much higher than is reported for neuropathologists (~60% sensitivity when searching for -syn patches across all stages, Signaevsky et al., 2022). While expert raters are still more precise (~6% better than the model), the model performed ~20% better than expert raters when considering precision and recall. The key output of the project is an open-source PoC tool that can automatically classify PD from digitised images of brain sections with accuracy that is approaching viability for real world applications. An MIT Licensed code repository has been released, containing all of the model development code, along with associated documentation, to allow others to build on the project teams work. This report summarises the scientific and engineering process undertaken through the development of the PoC tool.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
3
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%