Spontaneously blinking fluorophores for accelerated MINFLUX nanoscopy
Remmel, M.; Scheiderer, L.; Butkevich, A. N.; Bossi, M. L.; Hell, S. W.
Show abstract
Spontaneously blinking fluorophores, a class of molecules switching rapidly between a dark and a brightly emitting state, have emerged as a popular core to build fluorescent markers for super-resolution microscopy. With typical on-times in the order of tens of milliseconds, they are most suitable for STORM and related nanoscopy methods. Recent MINFLUX nanoscopy, however, can localize molecules even within a millisecond and achieve an up to ten times higher localization precision. Here, we present a series of spontaneous blinkers with short on-times (1-3 ms) matching MINFLUX recording time-scales. Our design builds upon a silicon rhodamine fluorescent core with a modified thiophene- or a benzothiophene-fused spirolactam fragment, which shifts the spirocyclization equilibrium toward the dark closed form at physiological conditions, imparting cell permeability. Concurrently, we obtain a highly photostable, short-lived open form with bright red emission. Characterizing the blinking behavior of single fluorophores bound to three different protein tags (antibodies, nanobodies, and HaloTag self-labeling enzyme) allowed us to select the best candidate for MINFLUX microscopy. The short on-times speed up MINFLUX localization by up to 30-fold.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biocompatible sulfonium-based covalent probes for endogenous tubulin fluorescence nanoscopy in live and fixed cells 96%
- NanoPlex: a universal strategy for fluorescence microscopy multiplexing using nanobodies with erasable signals 96%
- Fast-exchanging spirocyclic rhodamine probes for aptamer-based super-resolution RNA imaging 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.