Back

Revisiting the impact of synthetic ORF sequences on engineered LINE-1 retrotransposition

Richardson, S. R.; Chan, D.; Gerdes, P.; Han, J. S.; Boeke, J. D.; Faulkner, G. J.

2022-08-29 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.08.29.505632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The retrotransposon Long Interspersed Element 1 (L1) contains adenosine rich ORFs, a characteristic that limits its expression in mammalian cells. A synthetic mouse L1 (smL1) with ORF adenosine content decreased from 40% to 26% showed increased mRNA expression and retrotransposed far more efficiently than the native parental element, L1spa (1). Here, we observe two nonsynonymous substitutions between the L1spa and smL1 ORF1 sequences, and note that the smL1 3UTR lacks a conserved guanosine-rich region (GRR) which could potentially take on a G-quadruplex secondary structure. We find that the combined effect of a single amino acid change and the GRR 3UTR deletion, rather than synthetic ORF sequences, accounts for the increase in smL1 retrotransposition efficiency over L1spa. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the position of the GRR within the L1 reporter construct impacts retrotransposition efficiency. Our results prompt a reevaluation of synthetic L1 activity and suggest native mouse L1 mobility has in some cases been underestimated in engineered retrotransposition assays. Author SummaryL1 retrotransposons are mobile DNA elements or "jumping genes" that can copy- and-paste their sequences to new locations in the host genome. The jumping ability, or retrotransposition efficiency, of individual L1 elements can be evaluated using a cultured cell assay in which the L1 is tagged in its 3 untranslated region (3UTR) with a reporter gene that becomes expressed upon successful retrotransposition. In a previous study, authors Han and Boeke reported that the retrotransposition efficiency of a mouse L1 element could be enhanced dramatically by synthetically increasing the GC content of the L1 ORFs without changing their amino acid sequence. Curiously, a similarly constructed synthetic human L1 achieved only a modest increase in retrotransposition efficiency over the native element. Here, we find that two coding changes and partial deletion of the mouse L1 3UTR sequence which occurred during construction of the synthetic mouse L1 reporter actually are responsible for the increased jumping of this construct. We also find that changing the placement as well as the presence of this deleted 3UTR region within the reporter construct determines its impact on engineered retrotransposition efficiency. Together, our study reconciles the disparate impacts of synthetic sequences upon human and mouse L1 retrotransposition efficiency, prompts a reconsideration of numerous studies using synthetic L1 constructs, and will inform the ongoing use of synthetic and natural mouse L1 reporter constructs in vivo and in vitro.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.1%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
6
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
8
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
DNA Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
24
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
27
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%