Simplification of free-running cardiac magnetic resonance by respiratory phase using principal component analysis
Shammi, U. A.; Luan, Z.; Xu, J.; Hamid, A.; Flors, L.; Cassani, J.; Altes, T. A.; Thomen, R. P.; Van Doren, S. R.
Show abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides many cardiac functional insights. The reliance of standard cine CMR upon breath holds is not feasible for some patients. Its process of combining multiple heartbeats is unsuited to arrhythmias. Real-time cine methods sidestep these problems but can introduce respiratory displacement of the heart. To aid CMR acquisitions during breathing, we developed post-processing software to diminish the effects of respiratory displacement of the heart. It uses principal component analysis to resolve respiratory motions from cardiac cycles in the dynamic image. The software groups heartbeats from expiration and inspiration to decrease the appearance of respiratory motion. The effects of respiratory motion and such motion correction were evaluated on short-axis views (acquired with compressed sensing) of 11 healthy subjects and 8 cardiac patients. The smallest correlation coefficients between end-systolic frames of the original dynamic scans averaged 0.79. After segregation of cardiac cycles by respiratory phase, the mean correlation coefficients between cardiac cycles were 0.94 {+/-} 0.03 at end-expiration and 0.90 {+/-} 0.08 at end-inspiration. The improvements in correlation coefficients were significant in paired t-tests, i.e., P [≤] 0.01 for healthy subjects and P [≤] 0.001 for heart patients at end-expiration. Two expert cardiothoracic radiologists, blinded to the processing, assessed the dynamic images in terms of blood-myocardial contrast, endocardial interface definition, and motion artifacts. Clinical assessment preferred cardiac cycles during end-expiration, which maintained or enhanced scores in 90% of healthy subjects and 83% of the heart patients. Performance remained high in a case of arrhythmia and irregular breathing. Heartbeats collected from end-expiration reliably mitigated respiratory motion when the new software was applied to DICOM files from real-time acquisitions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly Accelerated Vessel-Selective Arterial Spin Labelling Angiography using Sparsity and Smoothness Constraints 95%
- Deep Learning Based Cardiac Cine Segmentation – Transfer Learning Application to 7T Ultrahigh-Field MRI 95%
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 97%
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 95%
- Indexing Cerebrovascular Health Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients 96%
- Strain patterns with ultrasound for improved assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm vessel wall biomechanics 92%
- Indexing Cerebrovascular Health Using TranscranialDoppler Ultrasound 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.