Back

A Different Kind of Restraint Suitable for Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Kolossvary, I. B.; Sherman, W. B.

2022-08-27 biochemistry
10.1101/2022.08.27.505552 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conformational sampling of complex biomolecules is an emerging frontier in drug discovery. Indeed, advances in lab-based structural biology and related computational approaches like AlphaFold have made great strides in obtaining static protein structures. However, biology is in constant motion and many important biological processes rely on conformationally-driven events. Unrestrained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations require that the simulated time be comparable to the real time of the biological processes of interest, rendering pure MD impractical for many drug design projects, where conformationally-driven biological events can take microseconds to milliseconds or longer. An alternative approach is to accelerate the sampling of specific motions by applying restraints, guided by insights about the underlying biological process of interest. A plethora of restraints exist to limit the size of conformational search space, although each has drawbacks when simulating complex biological motions. In this work, we introduce a new kind of restraint for molecular dynamics simulations (MD) that is particularly well suited for complex conformationallydriven biological events, such as protein-ligand binding, allosteric modulations, conformational signalling, and membrane permeability. The new restraint, which relies on a barrier function (the scaled reciprocal function) is particularly beneficial to MD, where hard-wall restraints are needed with zero tolerance to restraint violation. We have implemented this restraint within a hybrid sampling framework that combines metadynamics and extended-Lagrangian adaptive biasing force (meta-eABF). We use two particular examples to demonstrate the value of this approach: (1) quantification of the approach of E3-loaded ubiquitin to a protein of interest as part of the Cullin ring ligase and (2) membrane permeability of heterobi-functional degrader molecules with a large degree of conformational flexibility. Future work will involve extension to additional systems and benchmarking of this approach compared with other methods.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.2%
2
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
12
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
17
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
26
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%