Back

High sensitivity single cell RNA sequencing with split pool barcoding

Tran, V.; Papalexi, E.; Schroeder, S.; Kim, G.; Sapre, A.; Pangallo, J.; Sova, A.; Matulich, P.; Kenyon, L.; Sayar, Z.; Koehler, R.; Diaz, D.; Gadkari, A.; Howitz, K.; Nigos, M.; Roco, C. M.; Rosenberg, A. B.

2022-08-27 genomics
10.1101/2022.08.27.505512 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a core tool for researchers to understand biology. As scRNA-seq has become more ubiquitous, many applications demand higher scalability and sensitivity. Split-pool combinatorial barcoding makes it possible to scale projects to hundreds of samples and millions of cells, overcoming limitations of previous droplet based technologies. However, there is still a need for increased sensitivity for both droplet and combinatorial barcoding based scRNA-seq technologies. To meet this need, here we introduce an updated combinatorial barcoding method for scRNA-seq with dramatically improved sensitivity. To assess performance, we profile a variety of sample types, including cell lines, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), mouse brain nuclei, and mouse liver nuclei. When compared to the previously best performing approach, we find up to a 2.6-fold increase in unique transcripts detected per cell and up to a 1.8-fold increase in genes detected per cell. These improvements to transcript and gene detection increase the resolution of the resulting data, making it easier to distinguish cell types and states in heterogeneous samples. Split-pool combinatorial barcoding already enables scaling to millions of cells, the ability to perform scRNA-seq on previously fixed and frozen samples, and access to scRNA-seq without the need to purchase specialized lab equipment. Our hope is that by combining these previous advantages with the dramatic improvements to sensitivity presented here, we will elevate the standards and capabilities of scRNA-seq for the broader community.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.