Back

Effects of interspecies interactions on marine community ecosystem function

Daniels, M.; Stubbusch, A.; Held, N. A.; Schubert, O. T.; Ackermann, M.

2022-08-26 microbiology Community evaluation
10.1101/2022.08.26.505414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial communities perform key ecosystem processes collectively. One such process is the degradation of carbohydrate polymers, which are the dominant pool of organic carbon in natural environments. Carbohydrate polymers are often degraded in a stepwise manner. Individual steps are performed by different microbial species, which form trophic cascades with carbon polymers at the bottom and fully oxidised carbon at the top. It is widely believed that these trophic cascades are hierarchically organised, where organisms at each level rely on organisms at the levels below. However, whether and how the higher-level organisms can also affect processes at the lower levels is not well understood. Here we studied how carbohydrate polymer degradation mediated by secreted enzymes is affected by species at higher trophic levels, i.e., species that cannot produce the enzymes for polymer degradation but can grow in presence of the polymer degraders. We used growth and enzyme assays in combination with transcriptomics to study how chitin degradation by a number of Vibrio strains is affected by the presence of different cross-feeders that consume metabolic by-products. We found that interactions between the degraders and cross-feeders influence the rate of chitin degradation by the community. Furthermore, we show that this is a result of changes in chitinase expression by degraders. Overall, our results demonstrate that interactions between species can influence key ecosystem functions performed by individuals within microbial communities. These results challenge the perspective that trophic cascades based on metabolically coupled microbial communities are unidirectional and provide mechanistic insights into these downstream interactions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.