Back

Unraveling the genetic architecture of the adaptive potential of Arabidopsis thaliana to face the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in the context of global change

Roux, F.; Bartoli, C.; Riga, M.; Mayjonade, B.

2022-08-26 pathology
10.1101/2022.08.26.505380 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phytopathogens are a continuous threat for global food production and security. Emergence or re-emergence of plant pathogens is highly dependent on the environmental conditions affecting pathogen spread and survival. Under climate change, a geographic expansion of pathogen distribution poleward has been observed, potentially resulting in disease outbreaks on crops and wild plants. Therefore, estimating the adaptive potential of plants to novel epidemics and describing its underlying genetic architecture, is a primary need to propose agricultural management strategies reducing pathogen outbreaks and to breed novel plant cultivars adapted to pathogens that might spread in novel habitats under climate change. To address this challenge, we inoculated Pseudomonas syringae strains isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana populations located in south-west of France on the highly genetically polymorphic TOU-A A. thaliana population located east-central France. While no adaptive potential was identified in response to most P. syringae strains, the TOU-A population displays a variable disease response to the P. syringae strain JACO-CL belonging to the phylogroup 7 (PG7). This strain carried a reduced T3SS characteristic of the PG7 as well as flexible genomic traits and potential novel effectors. GWA mapping on 192 TOU-A accessions inoculated with JACO-CL revealed a polygenic architecture. The main QTL region encompasses two R genes and the AT5G18310 gene encoding for ubiquitin hydrolase, a target of the AvrRpt2 P. syringae effector. Altogether, our results pave the way for a better understanding of the genetic and molecular basis of the adaptive potential in an ecologically relevant A. thaliana - P. syringae pathosystem.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
4
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
10
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
25
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
28
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%