Back

Tracking neural correlates of prioritizing working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening

Li, D.; Hu, Y.; Qi, M.; Zhao, C.; Jensen, O.; Huang, J.; Song, Y.

2022-08-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.08.26.505307 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Previous work has proposed two potentials benefits of retrospective attention on working memory (WM): target strengthening and non-target inhibition. It remains unknown which hypothesis contributes to the improved WM performance, yet the neural mechanisms responsible for this attentional benefit are unclear. Here, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals while 33 participants performed a retrospective-cue WM task. Multivariate pattern classification analysis revealed that only representations of target features were enhanced by valid retrospective attention during the retention, supporting the target strengthening hypothesis. Further univariate analysis found that mid-frontal theta inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) and ERP components were modulated by valid retrospective attention and correlated with individual differences and moment-to-moment fluctuations on behavioral outcomes, suggesting that both trait- and state-level variability in attentional preparatory processes influence goal-directed behavior. Furthermore, task-irrelevant target spatial location could be decoded from EEG signals, indicating that enhanced spatial binding of target representation promotes high WM precision. Importantly, frontoparietal theta-alpha phase-amplitude-coupling was increased by valid retrospective attention and predicted the reduced randomly guessing rates. This long-range connection supported top-down information flow in engagement of frontoparietal networks, which might organize attentional states to integrate target features. Altogether, these results provide neurophysiological bases that retrospective attention improves WM precision through enhancing representation of target and emphasize the critical role of frontoparietal attentional network in the control of WM representations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
17
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
20
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
26
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%