A systematic review of clinical health conditions predicted by machine learning diagnostic and prognostic models trained or validated using real-world primary health care data
Abdulazeem, H.; Whitelaw, S.; Schauberger, G.; Klug, S.
Show abstract
AimWith the rapid advances in technology and data science, machine learning (ML) is being adopted by the health care sector; but there is a lack of literature addressing the health conditions targeted by the ML prediction models within primary health care (PHC). To fill this gap in knowledge, we conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines to identify the health conditions targeted by ML in PHC. MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Elsevier, BioRxiv, Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), and IEEE Xplore databases for studies published from January 1990 to January 2022. We included any primary study addressing ML diagnostic or prognostic predictive models that were supplied completely or partially by real-world PHC data. We performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Health conditions were categorized according to international classification of diseases. Extracted date were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. ResultsWe identified 109 studies investigating 42 health conditions. These studies included 273 ML prediction models supplied by the PHC data of 24.2 million participants from 19 countries. We found that 82% of the studies were retrospective. 76.6% of the studies reported diagnostic predictive ML models. 77% of all reported models aimed for models development without external validation. Risk of bias assessment revealed that 90.8% of the studies were of high or unclear risk of bias. The most frequently reported health conditions were Alzheimers disease and diabetes mellitus. ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to investigate the extent of the health conditions targeted by the ML prediction models within PHC settings. Our study provides an important summary on the presently available ML models in PHC, which can be used in further research and implementation efforts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 95%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 94%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of decision rules models to stratify coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension risk in preventive care: cohort study of returning UK Biobank participants 91%
- Intersections between copper, β-arrestin-1, calcium, FBXW7, CD17, insulin resistance and atherogenicity mediate depression and anxiety due to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nomothetic network approach 90%
- Practical barriers and facilitators experienced by patients, pharmacists and physicians to the implementation of pharmacogenomic screening in Dutch outpatient hospital care – an explorative pilot study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 93%
- The impact of residency training in family medicine on hospital admissions due to Ambulatory-care Sensitive Conditions in Rio de Janeiro 92%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 96%
- Machine Learning Approaches for Electronic Health Records Phenotyping: A Methodical Review 95%
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.