A model predictive control strategy to regulate movements and interactions
Takagi, A.; Gomi, H.; Burdet, E.; Koike, Y.
Show abstract
Humans are adept at moving the arm to interact with objects and surfaces. The brain is thought to regulate motion and interactions using two different controllers, one specialized for movements and the other for force regulation. However, it remains unclear whether different control mechanisms are necessary. Here we show that the brain can employ a single high-level control strategy for both movement and interaction control. The Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy introduced in this paper uses an internal model of the environment to plan the arms muscle activity whilst updating its predictions using periodic feedback. Computer simulations demonstrate MPCs ability to produce human-like movements and after-effects in free and force field environments. It can simultaneously regulate both force and stiffness during interactions, and can accomplish motor tasks demanding transitions between motion and interaction control. Model Predictive Control promises to be an important tool to test ideas of motor control as it can handle nonlinear dynamics with changing environments and goals without having to specify the movement duration.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An approximate stochastic optimal control framework to simulate nonlinear neuromusculoskeletal models in the presence of noise 98%
- Co-Contraction Embodies Uncertainty: An Optimal Feedforward Strategy for Robust Motor Control 97%
- During haptic communication, the central nervous system compensates distinctly for delay and noise 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Disturbance as a Force for Good in Motor Learning 97%
- A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability 95%
- Does enforcing glenohumeral joint stability matter? A new rapid muscle redundancy solver highlights the importance of non-superficial shoulder muscles 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.