Back

Air filtration mitigates aerosol levels both during and after OGD procedures

Phillips, F. M.; Crowley, J.; Warburton, S.; Staniforth, K.; Parra-Blanco, A.; Gordon, G. S. D.

2022-08-24 gastroenterology
10.1101/2022.08.23.22279118 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesUpper GI endoscopies are aerosol generating procedures (AGPs), increasing risk of spreading airborne pathogens. We aim to quantify mitigation of airborne particles via improved ventilation, specifically laminar flow theatres and portable HEPA filters, during and after upper GI endoscopies. MethodsThis observational study included patients undergoing routine oral gastroscopy in a standard endoscopy room with 15-17 air changes per hour, a standard endoscopy room with portable HEPA filtration unit, and a laminar flow theatre with 300 air changes per hour. A particle counter (diameter range 0.3{micro}m-25{micro}m) took measurements 10cm from the mouth. Three analyses were performed: whole procedure particle counts, event-based counts and air clearance estimation using post-procedure counts. ResultsCompared to a standard endoscopy room, for whole procedures we observe a 28.5x reduction in particle counts in laminar flow (p<0.001) but no significant effect of HEPA filtration (p=0.50). For event analysis we observe for lateral flow theatres reduction in particles >5{micro}m for oral extubation (12.2x, p<0.01), reduction in particles <5{micro}m for coughing/gagging (6.9x, p<0.05) and reduction for all sizes in anaesthetic throat spray (8.4x, p<0.01) but no significant effect of HEPA filtration. However, we find that in the fallow period between procedures HEPA filtration reduces particle clearance times by 40%. ConclusionsLaminar flow theatres are highly effective at dispersing aerosols immediately after production and should be considered for high-risk cases where patients are actively infectious or supply of PPE is limited. Portable HEPA filers can safely reduce fallow time between procedures by 40%.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
5
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%