Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: a cross-sectional study in 20 countries
Teixeira, F.; Li, E.; Laranjo, L.; Collins, C.; Irving, G.; Fernandez, M. J.; Car, J.; Ungan, M.; Petek, D.; Hoffman, R.; Nessler, K.; Majeed, A.; Lingner, H.; Jimenez, G.; Darzi, A.; Jacome, C.; Neves, A. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe extension to which digital technologies are employed to promote the delivery of high-quality healthcare is known as Digital Maturity. Individuals and systems digital maturity are both necessary to ensure a successful, scalable and sustainable digital transformation in healthcare. Digital maturity in primary care has been scarcely evaluated. ObjectivesThis study assessed the digital maturity - as a whole and in its dimensions - in General Practice and evaluated how participants demographic characteristics, practice characteristics and features of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) use are associated with digital maturity. MethodsGeneral Practitioners (GPs) across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June and September 2020. Demographic data, practice characteristics and features of EHRs use were collected. Digital maturity was evaluated through a framework built upon usage, resources and ability (divided in this study in its collective and individual components), interoperability, general evaluation methods and impact of digital technologies. Each dimension was rated as 1 or 0. The digital maturity score is the sum of the six dimensions and ranges from 0 to 6 (maximum digital maturity). Multivariable linear regression was used to model the total score, while multivariable logistic regression was used to model the probability of meeting each dimension of the score. Results1,600 GPs (61% female, 68% Europeans) participated. GPs had a median digital maturity of 4 (P25-P75: 3-5). Positive associations with digital maturity were found for: being male (B=0.18 [95%CI 0.01;0.36]), use of EHRs for longer periods (B=0.45 [95%CI 0.35;0.54]) and higher frequencies of access to EHRs (B=0.33 [95%CI 0.17;0.48]). Practising in a rural setting was negatively associated with digital maturity (B=-0.25 [95%CI -0.43;-0.08]). Usage (90%) was the most acknowledged dimension while interoperability (47%) and use of best practice general evaluation methods (28%) were the least. Shorter durations of EHRs use were negatively associated with all digital maturity dimensions (aOR from 0.09 to 0.77). ConclusionsOur study demonstrated notable factors that impact digital maturity and exposed discrepancies in digital transformation across healthcare settings. It provides a roadmap for policymakers to develop more efficacious interventions to hasten and take the best advantage of digital transformation in General Practice.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 96%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 95%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 94%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- An electronic application to improve management of infections in low-income neonatal units: pilot implementation of the NeoTree Beta App in a public sector hospital in Zimbabwe. 91%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 92%
- A prospective evaluation of inter-rater agreement of routine medical records audits at a large general hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.