Back

Costing analysis to introduce a Contrast Enhanced Mammography service in place of existing breast MRI service for local staging of breast cancer

Savaridas, S.; Jin, H.

2022-08-22 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.08.18.22278958 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionContrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a functional imaging technique with comparable accuracy to MRI for loco-regional staging of breast cancer. This study assesses the cost impact of switching from CE-MRI to CESM for loco-regional staging of breast cancer from a public healthcare perspective. MethodsThe CE-MRI cost was obtained from NHS reference cost. The CESM cost was calculated using a bottom-up approach including use of the machine, pump injector, contrast, image storage and clinical staffs time for reporting and cannulation. The cost of upgrading existing machines to CESM or purchasing new mammographic machines were obtained via national procurement. Other costs were obtained from local pharmacy, published unit cost data, or estimated based on surveys. ResultsFor large health boards in Scotland ([&ge;]500 cancers diagnosed/annum), the cost savings of switching from CE-MRI to CESM range from {pound}64,069 to {pound}81,570. For small health boards (<500 cancers diagnosed/annum), the cost savings of switching from CE-MRI to CESM range from {pound}6,453 to {pound}23,953. The cost savings are most sensitive to the number of tests conducted per year, and whether the existing mammography machine can be upgraded to CESM or not. ConclusionSwitching from CE-MRI to CESM for loco-regional staging of breast cancer is likely to be cost saving for both large and small health boards in Scotland. Further research is urgently needed to confirm the non-inferiority of CESM to CE-MRI as a locoregional staging technique. The input data of this analysis can be updated when such results become available. HighlightsO_LISwitching from CE-MRI to CESM for locoregional staging is likely to be cost saving C_LIO_LIFor large health boards, estimated annual savings range from {pound}64,069 to {pound}81,570 C_LIO_LIFor a small health boards, estimated annual savings range from {pound}6,453 to {pound}23,953 C_LIO_LICost is driven by number of imaging studies and equipment upgrade vs replacement C_LIO_LIResearch to confirm the non-inferiority of CESM for locoregional staging is needed C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.