Dopaminergic neurons dynamically update sensory values during navigation
Kato, A.; Ohta, K.; Okanoya, K.; Kazama, H.
Show abstract
Updating the value of sensory cues through experiences is a critical element of adaptive behavior. Although dopaminergic neurons (DANs) achieve this by driving associative learning, whether they contribute to assessment of sensory values outside the context of association remains largely unexplored. Here we show in Drosophila that DANs in the mushroom body encode the innate value of odors and constantly update the current value by inducing plasticity during olfactory navigation. Simulation of neuronal activity in a network based on the connectome data reproduced the characteristics of DAN responses, proposing a concrete circuit mechanism for computation. Notably, odors alone induced value- and dopamine-dependent changes in the activity of mushroom body output neurons, which store the current value of odors, as well as the behavior of flies steering in a virtual environment. Thus, the DAN circuit known for discrete, associative learning also continuously updates odor values during navigation in a non-associative manner.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchical architecture of dopaminergic circuits enables second-order conditioning in Drosophila 99%
- Neural circuit mechanisms for transforming learned olfactory valences into wind-oriented movement 98%
- Nitric oxide acts as a cotransmitter in a subset of dopaminergic neurons to diversify memory dynamics 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience-dependent plasticity modulates ongoing activity in the antennal lobe and enhances odor representations 98%
- A neural system that represents the association of odors with rewarded outcomes and promotes behavioral engagement 96%
- Heterogeneous habenular neuronal ensembles during selection of defensive behaviors 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.