Back

Sex-specific T cell exhaustion drives differential immune responses in glioblastoma

Lee, J.; Nicosia, M.; Silver, D. J.; Li, C.; Bayik, D.; Watson, D. C.; Lauko, A.; Johnson, S.; McGraw, M.; Grabowski, M.; Kish, D.; Desai, A.; Goodman, W.; Cameron, S.; Okada, H.; Valujskikh, A.; Fairchild, R. L.; Ahluwalia, M. S.; Lathia, J. D.

2022-08-18 immunology
10.1101/2022.08.17.503211 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) incidence and outcome are well recognized, and emerging evidence suggests that these extend to genetic/epigenetic and cellular differences, including immune responses. However, the mechanisms driving immunological sex differences are not fully understood. Using GBM models, we demonstrate that T cells play a critical role in driving GBM sex differences. Male mice exhibited accelerated tumor growth, with decreased T cell infiltration and increased T cell exhaustion. Furthermore, a higher frequency of progenitor exhausted T cells was found in males, with improved responsiveness to anti-PD1 treatment. Bone marrow chimera and adoptive transfer models indicated that T cell-mediated tumor control was predominantly regulated in a cell-intrinsic manner, which was further corroborated by in vitro exhaustion assays. Moreover, increased T cell exhaustion was observed in male GBM patients. These findings demonstrate sex-specific pre-determined behavior of T cells is critical in inducing sex differences in GBM progression and immunotherapy response. Statement of significanceImmunotherapies in GBM patients have been unsuccessful due to a variety of factors including the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in GBM. This study demonstrates that sex-specific T cell behaviors are predominantly intrinsically regulated, further suggesting sex-specific approaches can be leveraged to potentially improve therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy in GBM.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.