Back

A comparative study of two grasswren species reveals strong genetic divergence between a peninsula and mainland population

Gibson Vega, A.; Hall, M. L.; Ridley, A.; Cowen, S. J.; Slender, A. L.; Burbidge, A. H.; Louter, M.; Kennington, W. J.

2022-08-16 genetics
10.1101/2022.08.15.503954 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dispersal patterns dictate genetic population structure, and ultimately population resilience, through maintaining critical ecological processes and genetic diversity. Direct observation of dispersal events is not often possible, but genetic methods offer an alternative method of indirectly measuring dispersal. Here, we use 7 652 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to evaluate genetic population structure and infer dispersal capabilities of the Western Grasswren (Amytornis textilis textilis; WGW) in Western Australia (n = 118), utilising a sister species, the Thick-billed Grasswren (Amytornis modestus; TBGW) as a comparison dataset (n = 80). We found genetic divergence and low genetic diversity between two populations (Hamelin and Peron) in the WGW, despite evidence of long dispersal distances within populations by females. In addition, the two WGW populations were found to be more genetically divergent than two described subspecies of TBGW, despite the WGW occurring over a smaller spatial scale. By comparing these two grasswren species, our data suggest a narrow strip of land may be acting as a geographic barrier in the WGW, limiting dispersal between a peninsula population to the mainland. We investigate if morphology aligns with genetic divergence, with some estimates of divergence between WGW populations greater than those between subspecies of TBGW. However, confidence intervals were large, preventing definitive conclusions. Our results support the hypothesis that peninsula populations of small, ground-dwelling birds are genetically isolated from adjacent mainland populations. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the limited gene flow is asymmetrical, with directional dispersal occurring from the bounded peninsula population to the mainland. Our study also highlights how substantial genetic divergence does not necessarily coincide with phenotypic differences.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.9%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
19
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%