Back

Using computational simulations to quantify genetic load and predict extinction risk

Kyriazis, C. C.; Robinson, J. A.; Lohmueller, K. E.

2022-08-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.08.12.503792 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Small and isolated wildlife populations face numerous threats to extinction, among which is the deterioration of fitness due to an accumulation of deleterious genetic variation. Genomic tools are increasingly used to quantify the impacts of deleterious variation in small populations; however, these approaches remain limited by an inability to accurately predict the selective and dominance effects of individual mutations. Computational simulations of deleterious genetic variation offer an alternative and complementary tool that can help overcome these limitations, though such approaches have yet to be widely employed. In this Perspective, we aim to encourage conservation genomics researchers to adopt greater use of computational simulations to aid in quantifying and predicting the threat that deleterious genetic variation poses to extinction. We first provide an overview of the components of a simulation of deleterious genetic variation, describing the key parameters involved in such models. Next, we clarify several misconceptions about an essential simulation parameter, the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations, and review recent debates over what the most appropriate DFE parameters are. We conclude by comparing modern simulation tools to those that have long been employed in population viability analysis, weighing the pros and cons of a genomics-informed simulation approach, and discussing key areas for future research. Our aim is that this Perspective will facilitate broader use of computational simulations in conservation genomics, enabling a deeper understanding of the threat that deleterious genetic variation poses to biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
3
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
6
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
11
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
12
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
20
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%