An evaluation of the early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Zambia's routine immunization program
Winter, A. K.; Takahashi, S.; Carcelen, A.; Hayford, K.; Mutale, W.; Mwansa, F. D.; Sinyange, N.; Ngula, D.; Moss, W. J.; Mutembo, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundImplications of the COVID-19 pandemic for both populations and healthcare systems are vast. In addition to morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, the pandemic also has disrupted local health systems, including reductions or delays in routine vaccination services and catch-up vaccination campaigns that could lead to outbreaks of other infectious diseases that result in an additional burden of disease and strain on the healthcare system. Methods and FindingsWe evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Zambias routine childhood immunization program in 2020 using multiple sources of data. We relied on district-level administrative vaccination coverage data and Zambias 2018 Demographic and Health Survey to project disruptions to routine childhood vaccination within the pandemic year 2020 (N=5,670). Next, we leveraged serological data to predict age-specific measles seroprevalence and assessed the impact of changes in vaccination coverage on measles outbreak risk in each district. We found minor disruptions to routine administration of measles-rubella and pentavalent vaccines in 2020. This was in part due to Zambias Child Health Week held in June of 2020 which helped to reach children missed during the first six months of the year. We estimated that the two-month delay in a measles-rubella vaccination campaign, originally planned for September of 2020 but conducted in November of 2020 as a result of the pandemic, had little impact on modeled district-specific measles outbreak risks. ConclusionsThe pandemic only minimally increased the number of children missed by measles-rubella and pentavalent vaccines in 2020. However, the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 transmission since our analysis concluded means efforts to maintain routine immunization services and minimize the risk of measles outbreaks will continue to be critical. Fortunately, the methodological framework developed in this analysis relied on routinely collected data and can be used to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic disruptions in Zambia following 2020 and in other countries or for other vaccines at a sub-national level.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High measles and rubella vaccine coverage and seroprevalence among Zambian children participating in a measles and rubella supplementary immunization activity 95%
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi 94%
- Optimizing next-generation RSV prevention in Mali: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pediatric vaccination, maternal vaccination, and extended half-life monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden is in the eye of the beholder: Sensitivity of yellow fever disease burden estimates to modeling assumptions 94%
- Socioeconomic and temporal heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 exposure and disease in England from May 2020 to February 2023 93%
- Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 in India: Potential role of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant and delayed interventions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in Sindh Province, Pakistan 96%
- The impact of geographic targeting of oral cholera vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: a modeling study 95%
- Global epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of standardized population-based seroprevalence studies, Jan 2020-Dec 2021 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting the impact of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Ontario, Canada 94%
- Mapping the distribution of zero-dose children to assess the performance of vaccine delivery strategies and their relationships with measles incidence in Nigeria 94%
- Expected endpoints from future chikungunya vaccine trial sites informed by serological data and modeling 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.