Back

Investigating resting state neurophysiological markers of apathy and processing speed in prodromal and early-stage manifest Huntington's disease

Davis, M.-C.; Hill, A. T.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Bailey, N. W.; Stout, J. C.; Hoy, K. E.

2022-08-10 neurology
10.1101/2022.08.09.22278610 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo find sensitive biological markers of non-motor symptoms in Huntingtons disease (HD), which are essential for the development and assessment of novel treatments. MethodsWe used resting state EEG to examine differences in oscillatory activity (analysing the isolated periodic as well as the complete EEG signal) and functional connectivity in 22 late premanifest and early stage people with HD and 20 neurotypical controls. We then assessed the correlations between these neurophysiological markers and clinical measures of apathy and cognitive functioning. ResultsSignificantly lower theta and greater delta resting state power was seen in the HD group, as well as significantly greater delta connectivity. There was a significant positive correlation between theta power and processing speed, however there were no associations between the neurophysiological and apathy measures. ConclusionsWe speculate that these changes in oscillatory power and connectivity reflect ongoing, frontally concentrated degenerative and compensatory processes associated with HD. SignificanceOur findings support the potential utility of quantitative EEG as a proximate marker for non-motor symptoms in HD. HighlightsO_LIWe examined EEG oscillatory power and functional connectivity as a marker of non-motor symptoms in HD. C_LIO_LIThe HD group had lower theta power, higher delta power and connectivity, and theta power was correlated with processing speed. C_LIO_LIOur findings support the use of quantitative EEG metrics as potential non-motor symptom markers for clinical research in HD. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.