Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake in Wales: examination of the impact of the temporary suspension of the screening programme during the COVID-19 pandemic
Bright, D.; Hillier, S.; Song, J.; Huws, D. W.; Greene, G.; Hodgson, K.; Akbari, A.; Griffiths, R.; Davies, A. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundResponse to the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the temporary disruption of cancer screening in the UK, and strong public messaging to stay safe and to protect NHS capacity. Following reintroduction in services, we explored the impact on inequalities in uptake of the Bowel Screening Wales (BSW) programme to identify groups who may benefit from tailored interventions. MethodsRecords within the BSW were linked to electronic health records (EHR) and administrative data within the Secured Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Ethnic group was obtained from a linked data method available within SAIL. We examined uptake for the first 3 months of invitations (August to October) following the reintroduction of BSW programme in 2020, compared to the same period in the preceding 3 years. Uptake was measured across a 6 month follow-up period. Logistic models were conducted to analyse variations in uptake by sex, age group, income deprivation quintile, urban/rural location, ethnic group, and clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) status in each period; and to compare uptake within sociodemographic groups between different periods. ResultsUptake during August to October 2020 (period 2020/21; 60.4%) declined compared to the same period in 2019/20 (62.7%) but remained above the 60% Welsh standard. Variation by sex, age, income deprivation, and ethnic groups was observed in all periods studied. Compared to the pre-pandemic period in 2019/20, uptake declined for most demographic groups, except for older individuals (70-74 years) and those in the most income deprived group. Uptake continues to be lower in males, younger individuals, people living in the most income deprived areas and those of Asian and unknown ethnic backgrounds. ConclusionsOur findings are encouraging with overall uptake achieving the 60% Welsh standard during the first three months after the programme restarted in 2020 despite the disruption. Inequalities did not worsen after the programme resumed activities but variations in CRC screening in Wales associated with sex, age, deprivation and ethnicity remain. This needs to be considered in targeting strategies to improve uptake and informed choice in CRC screening to avoid exacerbating disparities in CRC outcomes as screening services recover from the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 92%
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Ethnic inequalities in multiple long-term health conditions in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis 92%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 94%
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 93%
- Prior health-related behaviours in children (2014-2020) and association with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during adolescence (2020-2021): a retrospective cohort study using survey data linked with routine health data in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review of the Experience of Implementing Population Testing for SARS-CoV-2 91%
- COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2) 91%
- Pre-pandemic national immunisation programme strength and health workforce capacity improved routine immunisation resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 93%
- The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on Italian population-based cancer screening activities and test coverage: results from national cross-sectional repeated surveys 93%
- Participation in the nation-wide cervical cancer screening programme in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.