Multi-channel intra-cortical micro-stimulation yields quick reaction times and evokes natural somatosensations in a human participant
Bjanes, D.; Bashford, L.; Pejsa, K.; Lee, B.; Liu, C.; Andersen, R.
Show abstract
Somatosensory brain-machine-interfaces (BMIs) can create naturalistic sensations by modulating activity of neural populations in the brain. By utilizing different spatial or temporal patterns of intra-cortical micro-stimulation (ICMS) in primary sensory cortex (S1), human patients suffering somatosensory loss can experience both cutaneous and proprioceptive sensory feedback. As evidenced by motor deficits in deafferented patients, rapid somatosensory feedback is critical for dexterous motor ability, in part because visual feedback is much slower than naturally occurring somatosensory input. However, somatosensory BMI studies typically report significantly longer cognitive processing latencies for cortical electrical stimulation than for naturally occurring somatosensations or visual sensations. In this study, we show that multi-channel electrical stimulation patterns elicit naturalistic somatosensory percepts in a human tetraplegic participant. Crucially, somatosensations evoked by multi-channel ICMS are cognitively processed at comparable latencies to naturally evoked sensations and significantly faster than visual sensations, as measured via a simple reaction time test. Further investigation demonstrated multi-channel stimulation could significantly reduce minimum amplitude detection thresholds and such reductions in charge density resulted in more frequent "natural" sensation descriptors reported by the human participant. Multi-channel ICMS patterns also evoked percepts with highly stable somatotopic locations. While some single-channel ICMS patterns evoked sensations 20-80% of the time, most multi-channel patterns could evoke sensations with 100% repeatability, an important step in demonstrating BCI device reliability. These improvements are all significant advances towards state-of-the-art sensory BMIs. The addition of such low-latency artificial sensory feedback to motor BMIs is expected to improve movement accuracy and increase embodiment for human users.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans 99%
- Computational modeling of dorsal root ganglion stimulation using an Injectrode 96%
- A machine-learning algorithm correctly classifies cortical evoked potentials from both natural retinal stimulation and electrical stimulation of the optic nerve 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of stimulus pulse rate on somatosensory adaptation in the human cortex 98%
- Subthreshold intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex enhances tactile sensitivity 96%
- Cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of cervical vagus vs. auricular nerve: a comparative, parametric study in nonhuman primates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 91%
- Towards optimization of oscillatory stimulation during sleep 90%
- Intraoperative laryngeal muscle and heart rate responses to implanted vagus nerve stimulation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.