Antibody feedback regulation of memory B cell development in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination
Schaefer-Babajew, D.; Wang, Z.; Muecksch, F.; Cho, A.; Raspe, R.; Johnson, B.; Canis, M.; DaSilva, J.; Ramos, V.; Turroja, M.; Millard, K.; Schmidt, F.; Dizon, J.; Shimeliovich, I.; Yao, K.-H.; Oliveira, T.; Gazumyan, A.; Gaebler, C.; Bieniasz, P. D.; Hatziioannou, T.; Caskey, M.; Nussenzweig, M. C.
Show abstract
Feedback inhibition of humoral immunity by antibodies was initially documented in guinea pigs by Theobald Smith in 1909, who showed that passive administration of excess anti-Diphtheria toxin inhibited immune responses1. Subsequent work documented that antibodies can enhance or inhibit immune responses depending on antibody isotype, affinity, the physical nature of the antigen, and engagement of immunoglobulin (Fc) and complement (C) receptors2, 3. However, little is known about how pre-existing antibodies might influence the subsequent development of memory B cells. Here we examined the memory B cell response in individuals who received two high-affinity IgG1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific monoclonal antibodies, C144-LS and C135-LS, and subsequently two doses of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The two antibodies target Class 2 and 3 epitopes that dominate the initial immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA vaccination4-8. Antibody responses to the vaccine in C144-LS and C135-LS recipients produced plasma antigen binding and neutralizing titers that were fractionally lower but not statistically different to controls. In contrast, memory B cells enumerated by flow cytometry after the second vaccine dose were present in higher numbers than in controls. However, the memory B cells that developed in antibody recipients differed from controls in that they were not enriched in VH3-53, VH1-46 and VH3-66 genes and predominantly expressed low-affinity IgM antibodies that carried small numbers of somatic mutations. These antibodies showed altered RBD target specificity consistent with epitope masking, and only 1 out of 77 anti-RBD memory antibodies tested neutralized the virus. The results indicate that pre-existing high-affinity antibodies bias memory B cell selection and have a profound effect on the development of immunological memory in humans that may in part explain the shifting target profile of memory antibodies elicited by the 3rd mRNA vaccine dose.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-reactive serum and memory B cell responses to spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 and endemic coronavirus infection 97%
- Single-Cell Profiling of the Antigen-Specific Response to BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vaccine 96%
- Immunologic and Biophysical Features of the BNT162b2 JN.1- and KP.2-Adapted COVID-19 Vaccines 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Analysis Reveals Distinct Antibody and Memory B Cell Responses in SARS-CoV2 Naïve and Recovered Individuals Following mRNA Vaccination 97%
- Class switch towards non-inflammatory IgG isotypes after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination 97%
- Omicron BA.2 breakthrough infection enhances cross-neutralization of BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An antibody targeting the N-terminal domain of SARS-CoV-2 disrupts the spike trimer 96%
- Durability of immune responses to the booster mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 95%
- Host immunological responses facilitate development of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in patients receiving monoclonal antibody treatments 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Memory B cell Development in Response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 and Nanoparticle Immunization in Mice 97%
- Pre-vaccination and early B cell signatures predict antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine 96%
- Conversion of monoclonal IgG to dimeric and secretory IgA restores neutralizing ability and prevents infection of Omicron lineages 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.