Back

Direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality in Switzerland: A population-based study

Riou, J.; Hauser, A.; Fesser, A.; Althaus, C. L.; Egger, M.; Konstantinoudis, G.

2022-08-06 public and global health
10.1101/2022.08.05.22278458 medRxiv
Show abstract

The direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population-level mortality is of concern to public health but challenging to quantify. We modelled excess mortality and the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on mortality in Switzerland. We analyzed yearly population data and weekly all-cause deaths by age, sex, and canton 2010-2019 and all-cause and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 deaths from February 2020 to April 2022 (study period). Bayesian models predicted the expected number of deaths. A total of 13,130 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 deaths were reported. The model estimated that COVID-19-related mortality was underestimated by a factor of 0.72 [95% Credible Interval: 0.46-0.78] resulting in 18,140 [15,962-20,174] excess deaths. After accounting for COVID-19 deaths, the observed mortality was 3% [-1-7] lower than expected, corresponding to a deficit of 4,406 deaths, with a wide credibility interval [-1,776-10,700]. Underestimation of COVID-19 deaths was greatest for ages 70 years and older; the mortality deficit was most pronounced in age groups 40 to 69 years. We conclude that shortcomings in testing caused underestimation of COVID-19-related deaths in Switzerland, particularly in older people. Although COVID-19 control measures may have negative effects (e.g., delays in seeking care or mental health impairments), after subtracting COVID-19 deaths, there were fewer deaths in Switzerland during the pandemic than expected, suggesting that any negative effects of control measures on mortality were offset by the positive effects. These results have important implications for the ongoing debate about the appropriateness of COVID-19 control measures.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
2
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
3
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
12
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
23
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%