Evaluation of a process to implement advance care planning conversations in primary care: uptake and patient experience
Arora, N.; Guenter, D.; Hafid, A.; Elston, D.; Gallagher, E.; Winemaker, S.; Hansen, N.; Waters, H.; Howard, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveAdvance care planning (ACP) can support patients in achieving current and future medical care that aligns with their values and goals. In primary care, a lack of standardized processes hinders implementation of ACP conversations. This study reports a quality improvement process to identify and engage patients and clinicians in ACP. MethodsPrimary care clinicians received training in conversations based on the Serious Illness Conversation Guide and tools to support ACP. In December 2019, patients 65 years of age and older with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were systematically identified, mailed ACP resources and telephoned by the clinic to invite them to an ACP appointment. We tracked the attendance of the patients and evaluated patient experience using a survey. ResultsOf the 91 patients telephoned, 50 were reached, and 27 attended the appointment. Further efforts were suspended in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirteen patients completed the survey. There were statistically significant increases in the patients perception of being heard and understood by their physician, feeling hopeful about quality of life and feeling peaceful. ConclusionThis study provides evidence that with training, tools and processes, patients and primary care clinicians can be effectively engaged in ACP conversations. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat was already known?C_ST_ABSO_LITraining resources exist for help clinicians enhance their advance care planning communication skills C_LIO_LIBesides a need for skills, other practical challenges exist in implementing advance care planning in family practice C_LI What are the new findings?O_LIStructured patient identification and preparation can facilitate advance care planning conversations in family practice C_LIO_LIPatients reported positive experiences of the conversations C_LI What is their significance?O_LIClinical: It is important to move beyond clinician training alone to implement processes in family practice to trigger advance care planning conversations C_LIO_LIResearch: Further research to identify effective scalable approaches to triggering and implementing advance care planning conversations in family practice would be beneficial C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 93%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 96%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 94%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 95%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 95%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.