Back

Finding a Needle in the Haystack: Design and Implementation of a Digital Site-less Clinical Study of Serial Rapid Antigen Testing to Identify Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Soni, A.; Herbert, C.; Pretz, C.; Stamegna, P.; Filippaios, A.; Shi, Q.; Suvarna, T.; Harman, E.; Schrader, S.; Nowak, C.; Schramm, E.; Kheterpal, V.; Behar, S.; Tarrant, S.; Ferranto, J.; Hafer, N.; Robinson, M.; Achenbach, C.; Murphy, R.; Manabe, Y. C.; Barton, B.; O'Connor, L.; Fahey, N.; Orvek, E.; Lazar, P.; Ayturk, D.; Wong, S.; Zai, A.; Cashman, L.; Rao, L. V.; Luzuriaga, K.; Lemon, S. C.; Blodgett, A.; Heetderks, W.; Broach, J.; McManus, D.

2022-08-05 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.08.04.22278274 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRapid antigen tests (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 with Emergency Use Authorization generally include a condition of authorization to evaluate the tests performance in asymptomatic individuals when used serially. ObjectiveTo describe a novel study design to generate regulatory-quality data to evaluate serial use of Ag-RDT in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus among asymptomatic individuals. DesignProspective cohort study using a decentralized approach. Participants were asked to test using Ag-RDT and molecular comparators every 48 hours for 15 days. SettingParticipants throughout the mainland United States were enrolled through a digital platform between October 18, 2021 and February 15, 2022. Ag-RDTs were completed at home, and molecular comparators were shipped to a central laboratory. ParticipantsIndividuals over 2 years old from across the U.S. with no reported COVID-19 symptoms in the 14 days prior to study enrollment were eligible to enroll in this study. MeasurementsEnrollment demographics, geographic distribution, and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are reported. Key ResultsA total of 7,361 participants enrolled in the study, and 492 participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 154 who were asymptomatic and tested negative to start the study. This exceeded the initial enrollment goals of 60 positive participants. We enrolled participants from 44 U.S. states, and geographic distribution of participants shifted in accordance with the changing COVID-19 prevalence nationwide. LimitationsNew, complex workflows required significant operational and data team support. Conclusions: The digital site-less approach employed in the Test Us At Home study enabled rapid, efficient, and rigorous evaluation of rapid diagnostics for COVID-19, and can be adapted across research disciplines to optimize study enrollment and accessibility.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.