Finding a Needle in the Haystack: Design and Implementation of a Digital Site-less Clinical Study of Serial Rapid Antigen Testing to Identify Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Soni, A.; Herbert, C.; Pretz, C.; Stamegna, P.; Filippaios, A.; Shi, Q.; Suvarna, T.; Harman, E.; Schrader, S.; Nowak, C.; Schramm, E.; Kheterpal, V.; Behar, S.; Tarrant, S.; Ferranto, J.; Hafer, N.; Robinson, M.; Achenbach, C.; Murphy, R.; Manabe, Y. C.; Barton, B.; O'Connor, L.; Fahey, N.; Orvek, E.; Lazar, P.; Ayturk, D.; Wong, S.; Zai, A.; Cashman, L.; Rao, L. V.; Luzuriaga, K.; Lemon, S. C.; Blodgett, A.; Heetderks, W.; Broach, J.; McManus, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundRapid antigen tests (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 with Emergency Use Authorization generally include a condition of authorization to evaluate the tests performance in asymptomatic individuals when used serially. ObjectiveTo describe a novel study design to generate regulatory-quality data to evaluate serial use of Ag-RDT in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus among asymptomatic individuals. DesignProspective cohort study using a decentralized approach. Participants were asked to test using Ag-RDT and molecular comparators every 48 hours for 15 days. SettingParticipants throughout the mainland United States were enrolled through a digital platform between October 18, 2021 and February 15, 2022. Ag-RDTs were completed at home, and molecular comparators were shipped to a central laboratory. ParticipantsIndividuals over 2 years old from across the U.S. with no reported COVID-19 symptoms in the 14 days prior to study enrollment were eligible to enroll in this study. MeasurementsEnrollment demographics, geographic distribution, and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are reported. Key ResultsA total of 7,361 participants enrolled in the study, and 492 participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 154 who were asymptomatic and tested negative to start the study. This exceeded the initial enrollment goals of 60 positive participants. We enrolled participants from 44 U.S. states, and geographic distribution of participants shifted in accordance with the changing COVID-19 prevalence nationwide. LimitationsNew, complex workflows required significant operational and data team support. Conclusions: The digital site-less approach employed in the Test Us At Home study enabled rapid, efficient, and rigorous evaluation of rapid diagnostics for COVID-19, and can be adapted across research disciplines to optimize study enrollment and accessibility.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of the Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH): a point-of-care PCR test for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 97%
- Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study 96%
- Development of at-home sample collection logistics for large scale SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Volumetric Absorptive Micro Sampling to Measure Multidimensional Anti-Influenza Hemagglutinin IgG Antibodies by mPlex-Flu Assay 90%
- Operationalizing a complex acute clinical trial: Lessons from the BEACH study 90%
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adequacy of serial self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detection testing for longitudinal mass screening in the workplace 95%
- If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative 95%
- Rapid CRISPR-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic college students captures the leading edge of a community-wide outbreak 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Specimen Quality and Results from a Community-Wide, Home-Based Respiratory Surveillance Study 94%
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 93%
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Ordering Practices of the SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test at a Large Academic Medical Center 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiology on a Public University Campus in Washington State 91%
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.