Back

Discovery of quorum-sensing reprogramming determinants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a novel experimental evolution approach

Cai, W.; Liao, H.; Lu, M.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, X.; Dai, W.

2022-12-13 microbiology
10.1101/2022.08.01.502315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

LasR is a master regulator of quorum-sensing (QS) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. LasR-null mutants commonly appear in lung isolates from chronically infected cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. However, numerous such CF isolates have a QS-active phenotype, but factors underlying QS-reprogramming in LasR-null mutants remain largely unknown. Mutations in the transcriptional regulator gene mexT are well known to be responsible for QS-reprogramming in a laboratory LasR-null mutant strain, however, simultaneous occurrence of lasR and mexT mutations is rare in CF isolates. To identify QS-reprogramming determinants, we developed an experimental evolution approach, for which a QS-inactive LasR null mutant with an extra copy of mexT was engineered. In such a strain, spontaneous single mexT mutations are expected to have no or little phenotypic consequences. This novel method, named "targeted gene duplication followed by mutant screening" (TGD-MS), resulted in the identification of QS-active revertants with mutations in genes other than mexT. We characterized a QS-active revertant with a point mutation in rpoA, a gene encoding the -subunit of RNA polymerase. QS activation in this mutant was found to be associated with the down-regulated expression of mexEF-oprN efflux pump genes. Our study therefore uncovers a new functional role for RpoA in regulating QS activity. Furthermore, our results suggest that a regulatory circuit controlling the expression of the mexEF-oprN operon is critical for QS-reprogramming. In conclusion, our study reports on the identification of non-MexT proteins associated with QS-reprogramming in a laboratory strain, shedding light on possible QS activation mechanisms in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.