Back

A Drosophila glial cell atlas reveals a mismatch between detectable transcriptional diversity and morphological diversity

Lago-Baldaia, I.; Cooper, M.; Seroka, A. P.; Trivedi, C.; Powell, G. T.; Wilson, S. W.; Ackerman, S. D.; Fernandes, V. M.

2023-05-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.08.01.502305 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Morphology is a defining feature of neuronal identity. Like neurons, glia display diverse morphologies, both across and within glial classes, but are also known to be morphologically plastic. Here, we explored the relationship between glial morphology and transcriptional signature using the Drosophila central nervous system, where glia are categorized into five main classes (outer and inner surface glia, cortex glia, ensheathing glia, and astrocytes), which show within-class morphological diversity. We analysed and validated single cell RNA sequencing data of Drosophila glia in two well-characterized tissues from distinct developmental stages, containing distinct circuit types: the embryonic ventral nerve cord (motor) and the adult optic lobes (sensory). Our analysis identified a new morphologically and transcriptionally distinct surface glial population in the ventral nerve cord. However, many glial morphological categories could not be distinguished transcriptionally, and indeed, embryonic and adult astrocytes were transcriptionally analogous despite differences in developmental stage and circuit type. While we did detect extensive within-class transcriptomic diversity for optic lobe glia, this could be explained entirely by glial residence in the most superficial neuropil (lamina) and an associated enrichment for immune-related gene expression. In summary, we generated a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of glia in Drosophila, and our extensive in vivo validation revealed that glia exhibit more diversity at the morphological level than was detectable at the transcriptional level. This atlas will serve as a resource for the community to probe glial diversity and function.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.9%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
3
Glia
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
10
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
17
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Developmental Neurobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%