Accuracy of sensor-based classification of clinically relevant motor activities in daily life of children with mobility impairments
Rast, F. M.; Jucker, F.; Labruyere, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundWearable inertial sensors enable objective, long-term monitoring of motor activities in the childrens habitual environment after rehabilitation. However, sophisticated algorithms are needed to derive clinically relevant outcome measures. Therefore, we developed three independent algorithms based on the needs of pediatric rehabilitation. The first algorithm estimates the duration of lying, sitting, and standing positions and the number of sit-to-stand transitions with data of a trunk and a thigh sensor. The second algorithm detects active wheeling periods and distinguishes it from passive wheeling with data of a wrist and a wheelchair sensor. The third algorithm detects walking periods, discriminates between free and assisted walking, and estimates the covered altitude change during stair climbing with data of a single ankle sensor and a sensor placed on walking aids. Research questionThis study aimed to determine the accuracy of each algorithm in children undergoing rehabilitation. MethodsThirty-one children and adolescents with various medical diagnoses and levels of mobility impairments performed a semi-structured activity circuit. They wore inertial sensors on both wrists, the sternum, and the thigh and shank of the less-affected side. Video recordings, which were labeled by two independent researchers, served as reference criteria to determine the algorithms performance. ResultsThe activity classification accuracy was 97% for the posture detection algorithm, 96% for the wheeling detection algorithm, and 93% for the walking detection algorithm. SignificanceThis study presents three novel algorithms that provide a comprehensive and clinically relevant view of the childrens motor activities. These algorithms are described reproducibly and can be applied to other inertial sensor technologies. Moreover, they were validated in children with mobility impairments and can be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to determine the childrens motor performance in their habitual environment. To enable the evaluation of future algorithms, we published the labeled dataset.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using force data to self-pace an instrumented treadmill and measure self-selected walking speed 96%
- Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals 96%
- Rapid energy expenditure estimation for assisted and inclined loaded walking 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a smartphone embedded inertial measurement unit for measuring postural stability in older adults 96%
- The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model 95%
- Predicting vertical and shear ground reaction forces during walking and jogging using wearable plantar pressure insoles 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consensus based framework for digital mobility monitoring 97%
- An inertial sensor-based comprehensive analysis of manual wheelchair user mobility during daily life in people with SCI 97%
- Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous Monitoring of Head Turns: Compliance, Kinematics, and Reliability of Wearable Sensing 97%
- Inertial sensor-based centripetal acceleration as a correlate for lateral margin of stability during walking and turning 96%
- Modulation of Arm Swing Frequency and Gait Using Rhythmic Tactile Feedback 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limited diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease in a remotely-administered setting 92%
- Sensitive quantification of cerebellar speech abnormalities using deep learning models 89%
- Reliable data collection in participatory trials to assess digital healthcare apps. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.