Viral and Symptom Rebound in Untreated COVID-19 Infection
Deo, R.; Choudhary, M. C.; Moser, C.; Ritz, J.; Daar, E. S.; Wohl, D. A.; Greninger, A. L.; Eron, J. J.; Currier, J. S.; Hughes, M. D.; Smith, D. M.; Chew, K. W.; Li, J. Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere are reports of viral RNA and symptom rebound in people with COVID-19 treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Since the natural course of viral and symptom trajectories of COVID-19 has not been well described, we evaluated the incidence of viral and symptom rebound in untreated outpatients with mild-moderate COVID-19. MethodsThe study population included 568 participants enrolled in the ACTIV-2/A5401 platform trial who received placebo. Anterior nasal swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing on days 0-14, 21 and 28. Participants recorded the severity of 13 targeted symptoms daily from day 0 to 28. Viral rebound was defined as [≥]0.5 log10 viral RNA copies/mL increase and symptom rebound was defined as a 4-point total symptom score increase from baseline. Baseline was defined as study day 4 (primary analysis) or 8 days from symptom onset (secondary analysis). FindingsIn both the primary and secondary analyses, 12% of participants had viral rebound. Viral rebounders were older than non-rebounders (median 54 vs 47 years, P=0.04). Symptom rebound occurred in 27% of participants after initial symptom improvement and in 10% of participants after initial symptom resolution. The combination of high-level viral rebound to [≥]5.0 log10 RNA copies/mL and symptom rebound after initial improvement was observed in 1-2% of participants. InterpretationViral RNA rebound or symptom relapse in the absence of antiviral treatment is common, but the combination of high-level viral and symptom rebound is rare. FundingThis study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ACTIV-2/A5401 ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04518410.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Favipiravir for treatment of outpatients with asymptomatic or uncomplicated COVID-19: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial 97%
- COVID-19 redux: clinical, virologic, and immunologic evaluation of clinical rebound after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 95%
- Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: the phase 2b part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections reveal limited infectious virus shedding and restricted tissue distribution 93%
- Intramuscular Versus Intravenous SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab for Treatment of COVID-19 (COMET-TAIL): A Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial 93%
- Risk of Post-COVID Conditions among adolescents and adults who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for acute COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virological and serological characterization of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the UK: a special focus on variant detection 93%
- The effect of pre-existing coronavirus antibodies on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes in exposed household members 93%
- Casirivimab and imdevimab for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Peginterferon Lambda-1a for treatment of outpatients with uncomplicated COVID-19: a randomized placebo-controlled trial 96%
- Elevated mucosal antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 are correlated with lower viral load and faster decrease in systemic COVID-19 symptoms 93%
- Emergence of transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants with decreased sensitivity to antivirals in immunocompromised patients with persistent infections 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectory of viral load in a prospective population-based cohort with incident SARS-CoV-2 G614 infection 95%
- Analysis of severe illness after post-vaccination COVID-19 breakthrough among adults with and without HIV in the United States 92%
- Reduced seroconversion in children compared to adults with mild COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.