Back

Retinal Vein Occlusion at the University of Gondar Tertiary Eye Care and Training Centre, North-West Ethiopia

Tilahun, M.; Tsegaw, A.

2022-07-31 ophthalmology
10.1101/2022.07.29.22278195
Show abstract

ObjectiveRetinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular diseases after diabetic retinopathy. Delay in detection and treatment can result in irreversible visual impairment and blindness. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and clinical pattern of patients with RVO presentedd to the retina clinic at University of Gondar Tertiary Eye Care and Training Centre MethodsA hospital based Cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2017 - March 2018 and patients of all ages with RVO seen at our retina clinic during the study period were reviewed. Pertinent ophthalmic history, ophthalmic clinical examination and laboratory tests were done including detailed funducopy for each patient. Data were collected with structured questionnaire, entered to SPSS version 20 and analysed. ResultA total of 38 eyes of 36 new patients with RVOs were seen during the six month study period and reviewed. Twenty four (66%) study patients were males and the mean age was 58 {+/-} 10.87 years. Thirty four (94.4%) patients had unilateral disease. Nineteen (52.78%) had Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), 13 (36.11%) had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 4 (11.11%) had hemispheric retinal vein occlusion (HRVO). Glaucoma was the commonest risk factor seen in 17 (47.22%) patients followed by systemic hypertension 10 (27.78%) and diabetes mellitus 8 (22%). The commonest complications encountered were macular edema, retinal or optic disc neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma seen in 15 (41.67%), 11 (30.5%) and 4 (11.11%) patients respectively. Over a third of patients 15 (41.67%) presented to our retina clinic after 6 months of onset of the illness and 15 (39.47%) eyes were blind at presentation. ConclusionGlaucoma, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the most common risk factors identified among study patients. A majority of patients had potentially blinding complications. There was also delay in presentation. Diagnostic and therapeutic facilities of the center should be improved to prevent vision loss from complications. People should be educated to seek health care immediately after the onset of visual symptoms.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 13%
1.8× avg
2
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
183× avg
3
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 0.8%
17× avg
4
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.5%
92× avg
5
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
98× avg
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.7%
46× avg
7
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
60× avg
8
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 0.3%
17× avg
9
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.9%
19× avg
10
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 58%
2.6%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 8%
3.0× avg
12
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.5%
13
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 16%
0.9%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%