Back

Results of the basic-VRS trial: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of basic low vision rehabilitation in Portugal

Hernandez-Moreno, L.; Senra, H.; Marques, A. P.; Moreno-Perdomo, N.; Macedo, A. F.

2022-07-31 ophthalmology
10.1101/2022.07.29.22278192 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study was twofold: i) to investigate and characterize the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment, and ii) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. MethodsPatients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy and visual acuity in the range 0.4 to 1.0 logMAR in the better-seeing eye were recruited. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, health-related quality-of-life and costs of the intervention were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluated if the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12-weeks after the start in both arms. ResultsOf the 46 participants, 34(74%) were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy, 25(54%) were female and the mean age was 70.08 yrs (SD=8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability was 0.28 logits (SD=1.14) at baseline and it increased to 0.91logits (SD=1.24) after the intervention (p<0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (mean improvement = 0.10 logits, SE=0.11, p=0.95). Acuity in the better seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was {euro}118.79 (SD=24.37). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D-5L index value was {euro}3322/QALY and {euro}1235/QALY when using near acuity. ConclusionsThe current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.