Outlier expression of isoforms by targeted RNA sequencing as clinical markers of genomic variants in B lymphoblastic leukemia and other tumor types
Tsai, H. K.; Gogakos, T.; Lip, V.; Tsai, J.; Li, Y.-D.; Fisch, A.; Weiss, J.; Grimmett, L.; Tran, T. H.; Caron, M.; Langlois, S.; Sinnett, D.; Pikman, Y.; Kim, A. S.; Nardi, V.; Silverman, L. B.; Harris, M. H.
Show abstract
Recognition of aberrant gene isoforms indicative of underlying DNA events can impact molecular classification and risk stratification of B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Aberrant ERG isoforms have been proposed as markers of the favorable-risk DUX4-rearranged (DUX4r) subtype while deletion-mediated IKZF1 isoforms are associated with adverse prognosis in non-DUX4r B-ALL. The high-risk IKZF1plus signature depends on gene deletions including PAX5 while intragenic PAX5 amplifications (PAX5amp) are recurrent in the provisional B-ALL with PAX5-alteration subtype. In this study, we screened for outlier expression of isoforms within targeted RNA sequencing assays designed for fusions. Outlier analysis of known and novel IKZF1, ERG, and PAX5 isoforms was 97.0% (32/33), 90% (9/10), and 100% (6/6) sensitive and 97.8% (226/231), 100% (35/35), and 88.5% (23/26) specific for IKZF1 intragenic or 3 deletions, DUX4r, and PAX5 intragenic deletions respectively, where false positives were favored to represent low-level deletions below the limit of DNA-based detection. Outlier analysis also identified putative PAX5amp cases and revealed partial tandem duplication (PTD) spanning IKZF1 N159Y in the B-ALL with mutated N159Y subtype. To demonstrate utility in other tumor types, outlier analysis was 100% (9/9) sensitive and 100% (255/255) specific for KMT2A-PTD in hematologic samples and 100% (7/7) sensitive and 100% (79/79) specific for FGFR1 tyrosine kinase domain duplication in brain tumors. These findings support the use of aberrant isoform analysis in targeted RNA sequencing data as a robust strategy for the detection of clinically significant DNA events.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling IKZF1 lesions in B-ALL reveals distinct chemosensitivity patterns and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities 96%
- Mutual antagonism between glucocorticoid and canonical Wnt signaling pathways in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia 95%
- Genomics of PDGFR-rearranged hypereosinophilic syndrome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 95%
- Single-cell transcriptomics predicts relapse in MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants 94%
- A transcriptomic continuum of differentiation arrest identifies myeloid interface acute leukemias with poor prognosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- IGenomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes 90%
- Mapping RNA splicing variations in clinically-accessible and non-accessible tissues to facilitate Mendelian disease diagnosis using RNA-seq 90%
- COVID-19 in people with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, or schwannomatosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia 96%
- Genome-wide CRISPR Screens Identify Ferroptosis as a Novel Therapeutic Vulnerability in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 94%
- First-born twin has a higher risk of acute leukemia in a population-based assessment of cancer in twins in California, and lower than anticipated rate of twin concordance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Copy number signatures predict chromothripsis and associate with poor clinical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma 93%
- In vivo inducible reverse genetics in patients' tumors to identify individual therapeutic targets 93%
- Shared and distinct genetic etiologies for different types of clonal hematopoiesis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.