Network analysis applied to DASS-21: Emergence of a new dimension
Alvarenga, M. A. S.; Bandeira, P. F. R.; Guilhermino, C. S.; Azevedo, T. G. d.; Olimpio, K. F.; Kersul, C.; Cunha, G. L. d.; Alvares-Teodoro, J.; Ribeiro, P. C. C.; Mansur-Alves, M.; Teodoro, M. L. M.
Show abstract
The DASS-21 has been studied in different samples and cultures as a brief tool for screening and referral to specialized interventions, thus presenting the prerogative to be characterized as a complex system (CS). CS is a new approach to data analysis assumes that items on a scale are components integrated as a network. Despite this, to date network analysis has not been applied to verify the psychometric properties of the DASS-21. This was a non-clinical sample consisting of college students and professionals (N = 4017), aged 18 years or older (M = 31.16; SD = 10.308), from different Brazilian regions. The data collection was done through electronic forms composed by a sociodemographic questionnaire and DASS-21. Participants could forward the form to other potential respondents. Uni, bi, and multivariate analyses were used, and, among them, exploratory graph analysis (EGA) and boostrap EGA (BootEGA). EGA e BootEGA generated a model with four factors. The four-factor model from DASS-21 showed better fit rates compared to the others replicated in this research. The new four factor model has excellent composite reliability and is invariant regard to gender and type of activity performed. This research was composed of a non-probabilistic and convenience sample, without equitable geographical distribution of the participants and whose answers to this study were provided only by the web-based forms. The DASS-21 presented a new factor model composed of four distinct dimensions with excellent intrinsic features.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 96%
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 95%
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 95%
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 94%
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Acute Posttraumatic Stress Disorder during the COVID-19 Outbreak 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric In-Patients 92%
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 92%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 95%
- Assessing the influence of parental anxiety on childhood anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates 92%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.