Back

Lipid Desaturation Regulates the Balance between Self-renewal and Differentiation in Mouse Blastocyst-derived Stem Cells

Thomas, C.; Haimson, R. B.; Zacharia, A.; Orih, P.; Shehadeh, A.; Saidemberg, D.; Kogan, N. M.; Alfandary, S.; Serruya, R.; Dagan, A.; Petit, I.; Moussaieff, A.

2022-11-22 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.07.28.501839 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stem cells are defined by their ability to self-renew and to differentiate, both shown in multiple studies to be regulated by metabolic processes. To decipher metabolic signatures of self-renewal in blastocyst-derived stem cells, we compared early differentiating embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and their extra-embryonic counterparts - trophoblast (T)SCs to their self-renewing counterparts. A metabolomics analysis pointed to the desaturation of fatty acyl chains as a metabolic signature of differentiating blastocyst-derived SCs via the upregulation of delta-6 desaturase (D6D; FADS2) and delta-5 desaturase (D5D; FADS1), key enzymes in the biosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The inhibition of D6D or D5D by specific inhibitors or SiRNA retained stemness in ESCs and TSCs, and attenuated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-related apoptosis. D6D inhibition upregulated stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (Scd1) in ESCs, essential to maintain ER homeostasis. In TSCs, however, D6D inhibition downregulated Scd1. TSCs show higher Scd1 mRNA expression and high levels of monounsaturated fatty acyl chain products in comparison to ESCs. Addition of oleic acid - the product of Scd1 (essential for ESCs), to culture medium, was detrimental to TSCs. Interestingly, TSCs express a high molecular mass variant of Scd1 protein, hardly expressed by ESCs. Taken together, our data point to lipid desaturation as a metabolic regulator of the balance between differentiation and self-renewal of ESCs and TSCs. They point to lipid polydesaturation as a driver of differentiation in both cell types. In contrast, mono unsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), known to be essential for ESCs are detrimental to TSCs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.9%
5
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Cell Death & Differentiation
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%