Back

Global signal topography in the human brain differs systematically across the lifespan

Nomi, J.; Bzdok, D.; Li, J.; Bolt, T.; Chang, C.; Kornfeld, S.; Goodman, Z.; Yeo, B. T. T.; Spreng, R. N.; Uddin, L.

2023-08-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.07.27.501804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The global signal (GS) in resting-state fMRI, known to contain artifacts and non-neuronal physiological signals, also contains important neural information related to individual state and trait characteristics. Here we show distinct linear and curvilinear lifespan patterns of GS topography in a cross-sectional lifespan sample, demonstrating its importance for consideration in studies of development and aging. Subcortical brain regions such as the thalamus and putamen show linear associations with the GS across the lifespan. The thalamus has stronger coupling in older-age individuals compared with younger-aged individuals, while the putamen has stronger coupling in younger individuals compared with older individuals. The subcortical nucleus basalis shows a u-shaped pattern similar to cortical regions within the lateral frontoparietal network and dorsal attention network, where coupling with the GS is stronger at early and old age, with weaker coupling in middle age. This differentiation in coupling strength between subcortical and cortical brain activity across the lifespan supports a dual-layer model of GS composition, where subcortical aspects of the GS are differentiated from cortical aspects of the GS. We find that these subcortical-cortical contributions to the GS depend strongly on the lifespan stage of individuals. Our findings demonstrate how neurobiological information within the GS differs across development and highlight the need to carefully consider whether or not to remove this signal when investigating age-related functional differences in the brain.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.