Back

Arc Regulates a Second-Guessing Cognitive Bias During Naturalistic Foraging Through Effects on Discrete Behavior Modules

Ravens, A.; Stacher-Hörndli, C. N.; Emery, J.; Steinwand, S.; Shepherd, J. D.; Gregg, C.

2023-02-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.07.27.501779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Foraging involves innate decision heuristics that are adapted for the wild but can cause economically suboptimal cognitive biases in some contexts. The mechanisms underlying cognitive biases are poorly understood but are likely genetic. Here, we investigate foraging in fasted mice using a naturalistic paradigm and uncover an innate "second-guessing" cognitive bias that involves repeatedly investigating an empty former food patch instead of consuming available food. Second-guessing prevents mice from maximizing feeding benefits in the task. Since learning and memory are involved, we tested roles for the synaptic plasticity gene, Arc, and found that Arc-/- mice show a specific lack of second-guessing. Arc-/- males reap benefits by increasing food consumption. Unsupervised machine learning decompositions of foraging show that Arc affects discrete, stereotyped foraging sequences that we call modules within a rich naturalistic behavioral landscape. Thus, our study reports a second- guessing cognitive bias, ethological roles for Arc in naturalistic foraging, and links between genetically determined foraging modules and cognitive bias in decision making.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.