Back

Multiscale functional connectivity patterns of the aging brain learned from rsfMRI data of 4,259 individuals of the multi-cohort iSTAGING study

Zhou, Z.; Srinivasan, D.; Li, H.; Abdulkadir, A.; Nasrallah, I.; Wen, J.; Doshi, J.; Erus, G.; Mamourian, E.; Bryan, N. R.; Wolk, D. A.; Beason-Held, L.; Resnick, S. M.; Satterthwaite, T. D.; Davatzikos, C.; Shou, H.; Fan, Y.

2022-10-14 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.07.27.501626 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To learn multiscale functional connectivity patterns of the aging brain, we built a brain age prediction model of functional connectivity measures at seven scales on a large fMRI dataset, consisting of resting-state fMRI scans of 4259 individuals with a wide age range (22 to 97 years, with an average of 63) from five cohorts. We computed multiscale functional connectivity measures of individual subjects using a personalized functional network computational method, harmonized the functional connectivity measures of subjects from multiple datasets in order to build a functional brain age model, and finally evaluated how functional brain age gap correlated with cognitive measures of individual subjects. Our study has revealed that functional connectivity measures at multiple scales were more informative than those at any single scale for the brain age prediction, the data harmonization significantly improved the brain age prediction performance, and harmonization in the tangent space worked better than in the original space. Moreover, brain age gap scores of individual subjects derived from the brain age prediction model were significantly correlated with clinical and cognitive measures. Overall, these results demonstrated that multiscale functional connectivity patterns learned from a large-scale multi-site rsfMRI dataset were informative for characterizing the aging brain and the derived brain age gap was associated with cognitive and clinical measures.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.