Back

Evoked midfrontal activity predicts cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

Singh, A.; Cole, R.; Espinoza, A.; Wessel, J.; Cavanagh, J.; Narayanan, N. S.

2022-07-29 neurology
10.1101/2022.07.26.22278079 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive dysfunction is a major feature of Parkinsons disease (PD), but the pathophysiology remains unknown. One potential mechanism is abnormal low-frequency cortical rhythms which engage cognitive functions and are deficient in PD. We tested the hypothesis that midfrontal delta/theta rhythms predict cognitive dysfunction in PD. We recruited 100 PD patients and 49 demographically-similar control participants who completed a series of cognitive control tasks, including the Simon, oddball, and interval timing tasks. We focused on cue-evoked delta (1-4 Hz) and theta (4-7 Hz) rhythms from a single midfrontal EEG electrode (Cz) in PD patients who were either cognitively normal, with mild-cognitive impairments (PDMCI), or had dementia (PDD). We found that PD-related cognitive dysfunction was associated with increased response latencies and decreased midfrontal delta power across all tasks. Within PD patients, the first principal component of evoked EEG features from a single electrode (Cz) strongly correlated with clinical metrics such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA; rho=0.36) and with NIH-toolbox Executive Function scores (rho=0.46). These data demonstrate that cue-evoked midfrontal delta/theta rhythms directly relate to cognition in PD. Our results provide insight into the nature of low-frequency frontal rhythms and suggest that PD-related cognitive dysfunction results from decreased delta/theta activity. These findings could facilitate the development of new biomarkers and targeted therapies for cognitive symptoms of PD.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.